Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

The Story of Cotton

Nineteen-year-old José Revueltas in 1934 rides past fields of white gold cotton on his way from Mexico City to Estación Camarón near the U.S. border. He’s been sent by the Communist Party to find out more about the rumors that 5,000 to 15,000 cottonfield workers and migrant pickers are going on strike.

In 2015 author Christina Rivera Garza travels by train to the barren wilderness of Estación Camarón and observes: “Rather than passing, time has swept everything away under its wings,” taking with it information about workers on the cotton fields and the strike.

As reviewer of Autobiography of Cotton Dylan Cook notes, if Revueltas had not made this trip, nothing would be known about the strike, the workers, the conditions they endured, or the rights they fought for. And there would have been no starting place for the story of Garza’s own grandparents, Josė Maria Rivera Doñez and Petra Peña Martínez, the role of cotton in their lives, and the effect of the growth and cultivation of the crop on the people who harvested it and the land that fostered it. (Autobiography of Cotton, by Cristina Rivera Garza • Book Reviews)

Amazon.com: Autobiography of Cotton: A Novel: 9781644453698: Rivera Garza, Cristina: Books

For this reader’s review, see: https://historicalnovelsociety.org/reviewer/k-m-sandrick/

“Cotton is generous,” Garza observes in the article The Afterlife of Cotton. The crop was central to much of the agriculture in northern Mexico. It gave rise to many of the cities in the region, spurred demographic and economic expansion, fostered the growth of a rural middle class, led farmers and workers to push for agrarian reforms, and “reinforced the sense of self-reliance and autonomy so dear to norteños even today.”

But cotton is also cruel, she notes. Over time, the crop exhausted the land of northern Mexico. When Garza traveled near the Mexico-U.S. borderlands 11 years ago, she found that “cotton as such has but disappeared from both vision and memory. From [the towns of] Felicity to Winterhaven, the nomenclature of the desert suggests happy times, but the dunes near Yuma, imperial and white, and the recurrent, ominous presence of the border patrol hint otherwise. How many footprints have vanished here,” she wonders, “swallowed by sand?” (Cristina Rivera Garza: The Afterlife of Cotton: Los algodones https://literalmagazine.com/tag/overcast/; The afterlife of cotton appeared in the print edition of the magazine.)

The story of cotton is a long and complicated one. “For a scrawny, gangling plant that produces hairs about as substantial as milkweed, cotton has exerted a mighty hold over human events…,” writes Stephen Yafa in Cotton, The Biography of a Revolutionary Fiber.  It is found in ancient Africa, Asia, and South America. It has ridden along trails from India to Europe, covered the backs of great leaders of Mesoamerica, was pivotal to the Industrial Revolution and the American Civil War, dried up water supplies and poisoned soils.

The next series of TimeStamp posts tell some of the stories about cotton.

 Cotton’s Ancient History

Cotton can be traced back thousands of years BC. Thin strands of cotton fibers were found wound around a copper bead that had been buried in the Neolithic site of Mehrgarh near present-day Pakistan, placing the first known use of cotton at the 6th millennium BC or about 8000 years ago. (Where Did Cotton Originate? Its Ancient Global Roots, March 14, 2026)

Small fragments of cotton cloth from archaeological sites in the Indus Valley of Pakistan and India indicate cotton was being woven and spun in that part of the world as far back as 5000 BC. People of the Harappan civilization were principal producers and prime movers of cotton products from their heyday circa 3300 BC to their disappearance around 1600 BC, not only cultivating the crop but disseminating weaving techniques to other parts of the Indian subcontinent. https://humwp.ucsc.edu/cwh/brooks/cotton/The_Ancient_World.html

Cotton fragments in the Tel Tsaf site of Israel’s Jordan Valley date back roughly to 5200 – 4700 BC and are considered to be the earliest evidence of the material in the Near East. The fragments also suggest that cotton was actively traded as a valuable textile. Cotton is not a native plant in the Jordan Valley region, so cotton-made materials had to have been transported over thousands of kilometers from South Asia where cotton was present in the wild.  (Where Did Cotton Originate? Its Ancient Global Roots, March 14, 2026)

Cotton seeds from 5000 years ago have been found on the other side of the world in Peru. The seeds are some of the oldest in the region, suggesting that cotton was being grown and harvested even before some native food products were. (Dillehay et al, 2007) Cotton that was domesticated on the Yucatan peninsula as long as 4000 years ago is the same species that is cultivated in most of that region today. (Wendel, Brubaker and Percival, 1992)

Cotton fibers also have been found in the coastal desert of Peru in archaeological sites dating back to 2500 – 1750 BC, well before the areas were making pottery. The fibers carry natural chocolate and reddish-brown pigments that today are known as Egyptian or Pima cotton. (Where Did Cotton Originate? Its Ancient Global Roots)

The earliest traces of cotton in Mexico have been found on the Yucatan peninsula. Cotton fragments in Tehuacán in the Mexican state of Puebla date back 5500 – 4300 years ago. Similar types of fibers found in the Caribbean and North America suggest that cotton fabrics and weaving techniques were passed along trade routes to the east and north.

In addition to actual cotton remnants, written records have placed the fabric in prehistoric time. The earliest written records of Indian cotton describe cotton weaving in a number of locations in northern India as well as farms that were producing cotton fabrics for sale to cultivators in 500 BC. Records also document that cotton was one of the principal commodities India traded to Greece and Rome. (https://humwp.ucsc.edu/cwh/brooks/cotton/The_Ancient_World.html)

 Cotton Trade and Expansion

From the coastal areas of Peru, cotton and its production spread north through Central American and Mexico and into the American Southwest. The Hohokam, located in the Sonora Desert of Mexico and Arizona, were first in North American to make use of cotton in 100 CE for bags and clothing. Indigenous people at Snaketown along the Gila River in central Arizona roasted cottonseeds and prepared cotton cloths for more than 1000 years. (Cotton and Native Americans | Social Sciences and Humanities | Research Starters | EBSCO Research)

Egyptians grew cotton along the Nile River, used cotton and flax to make high-quality garments that were traded across the Mediterranean and throughout the ancient world.  Cotton appeared in China during the Yuan and Ming dynasties and quickly became a staple in domestic and international trade.

Cotton textiles were produced in Hausaland, Nigeria, as early as the 9th century and were traded among several areas in West Africa in the 11th century. Cotton in East Africa appeared around 500 BC along the Nile River. Cotton fabrics did not thrive, however, until the 9th to the 14th centuries when Islam made cotton popular as a fabric for lower classes to meet requirements for modesty. (https://www.okofarms.org/cottonexploration-1)

Troops in Alexander the Great’s armies (325 BC) wore cotton loincloths and padded their saddles with this “vegetable wool.” Andean mummies were swathed in cotton. Burial sites bore embroidered cotton mantles. Egyptian priests were robed in cotton. (Yafa) But cotton was more than just a fabric.  

Cotton as Communication

Ancient civilizations used cotton clothing and textiles not only for trade and currency or everyday coverings while they worked, worshiped, and otherwise went about their lives. Cotton was woven in intricate patterns and dyed in many hues that reflected culture, beliefs, historical events, and elements of nature.

The quetzal. https://tramatextiles.org/blogs/trama-blog/maya-textile-symbols-and-their-meanings

In ancient Maya (beginning in 2000 BC), weaving cotton was a way to tell stories about:

·         Origins. A spider spinning its web recalls the goddess Itzam showing a weaver how to weave threads to form an intricate whole. 

·         Good and evil. As guardians to the underworld, bats rule over darkness and mark enemies.

·         Hope vs. pain and suffering. A white butterfly with its wings spread signals freedom, good news, and positivity. A black butterfly represents negativity and tragedy. A green butterfly is a symbol of hope and good health.

·         Wisdom. The presence of a double-headed eagle helps guide inner wisdom and focus.

·         Nature. The flowers that bloom throughout the year—cacti, gladioli, lilies, pansies, and roses—symbolize fertility and life.

·         History. The red chest of the quetzal, the national bird of Guatemala, represents the blood lost while Mayans protected their land and their people.

·         Life and work of the weaver. A diamond symbolizes the weaver—body at the base, textiles at the top, and the arms at the sides linking the worker to the product. ( https://tramatextiles.org/blogs/trama-blog/maya-textile-symbols-and-their-meanings )

 Death symbol. https://tramatextiles.org/blogs/trama-blog/maya-textile-symbols-and-their-meanings

In other cultures, complex woven cotton fabrics carried messages about status and power. In the Wari civilization (500 BC) textiles were valued as highly as precious metals. (Dass, 2001).

For the Incas, finely fashioned fabrics were even more highly prized. Garments intended for tribute, religious, or royal functions often wove in slivers of precious metals or features from rare birds or added complex embroidery. Even the chosen colors expressed messages—red for bloodshed or conquest, green for the rainforest and its inhabitants, black for death, yellow for corn or gold, and purple to honor the mother of the Inca race.

 Sources

How a Pulitzer winner resurrected a forgotten U.S.-Mexico border rebellion - Los Angeles Times

 https://books.google.com/books/about/Cotton.html?id=DZoxe0aO9AEC

 Autobiography of Cotton by Cristina Rivera Garza | World Literature Today

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/05/books/review/cristina-rivera-autobiography-of-cotton.html

 Stephen Yafa: Cotton: The Biography of a Revolutionary Fiber, Penguin Books, 2006

Recurso: 20 símbolos tradicionales maya para textiles

 Where Did Cotton Originate, March 14, 2026

Simon Kensington: The Vibrant Evolution of Cotton in Clothing and Fabrics.

Cristina Rivera Garza - Wikipedia

Cotton Explorations: The Ancient History of the Cotton Plant, Parts 1 and 2. https://www.okofarms.org/cottonexploration-1

(1) Preceramic Adoption of Peanut, Squash, and Cotton in Northern Peru

https://humwp.ucsc.edu/cwh/brooks/cotton/The_Ancient_World.html

 

Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

The Devil’s Kitchen—Yellowstone National Park

Seasonal National Park Service Ranger Clarence Johnson is introducing a group of hikers to Yellowstone National Park’s Uncle Tom Trail, the 324-stair decline from the top to the bottom of the canyon that replaced the trail established in 1898 by H.F. Richardson and dropped tourists down from the rocky edge using ropes and ladders. After noting a turkey vulture circling above, he opens a laminated copy of artist Thomas Moran’s painting of the Lower Yellowstone Falls, then stops as a girl in the group asks whether the vulture is circling because of the man who’s lying dead below.    

 https://www.yellowstonepark.com/things-to-do/natural-wonders/artist-point/

 After calling the incident in to the Park Service’s ISB detectives, Clarence meets with Special Agent Alison Nance. Recently retired from the Fort Worth Police Department because of a gun injury to his leg, Clarence explains to Alison that she’s leading the investigation from the wrong crime scene. The dead man was not killed among the piles of rocks where investigators are searching for evidence. The man was killed near the parking area and observation deck where tourists and others are now contaminating forensics.

Impressed by Clarence’s observations and attention to detail, Alison invites him to join the investigation. Their journey is detailed in The Devil’s Kitchen, first in the Johnson and Nance mystery series by author Mark Thielman. The plot moves back and forth between two time periods—the late 1700s and the present day—and two locations—France during the French Revolution and the site of America’s first national park extending from Wyoming to Montana and Idaho.

https://markthielman.com/the-devils-kitchen-2/

For this author’s review, see:

https://historicalnovelsociety.org/reviews/the-devils-kitchen-a-murder-in-yellowstone-the-johnson-and-nance-mysteries-1/

The last Time Stamp blog post traveled more than 200 years back in time to explore the object at the heart of The Devil’s Kitchen murder—the 7th Century Scepter of Dagobert and the audacious plot to protect it from revolutionary iconoclasts hell bent on destroying artifacts from France’s feudal past.

This month’s post backpacks along rocky outcroppings to explore today’s Devil’s Kitchen and the Yellowstone National Park and think about their past.

Devil’s Kitchen

The 115- to 128-acre nature preserve in the Bighorn Basin of northern Wyoming, called the Devil’s Kitchen, is a geologic wonder. A classic badland spanning eerie shapes, ravines, rock towers, and steep slopes, the area has layers of sedimentary claystone, sandstone, and shale that surround decorative chalcedony and dinosaur gizzard stones, gastroliths.

Geologists consider the Devil’s Kitchen badlands as “a classic example of inverted topography” or an anticline—a broad, arch-like rock formation created by the action of tectonic forces more than 70 million years ago. “An anticline is folded rock in the shape of an umbrella or an upside down ship hull.  At Devils' Kitchen, the top of the umbrella shape is eroded off so it resembles a cut onion.” (https://usa-travelcenter.de/discoveramerica/wbb/wbb2/index.php?thread/17393-devils-kitchen-geological-site-greybull-wy/)

 “Think of a rug or a stack of colored paper that is pushed and distorted into wrinkles. In geology each page is a formation or type of rock, like sandstone or mudstone or limestone. Imagine the top page is hard, like a sandstone. Then imagine that the ‘hard’ page overlies a ‘soft page’ composed of mudstone. As the fold was exposed by erosion, the hard sandstone eroded off the top of the fold exposing the soft mudstone below it. At that point, the center of the fold exposed the softest rocks composed of clay-rich mudstones which were susceptible to weathering and erosion. Around the rim today are the most resistant sandstones. The center of the fold now erodes faster than the rim creating a depression in the center of the fold.” (https://www.bighornbasindinos.org/devilskitchen)

 A cavern on the badlands is the crater of an extinct hot spring. Adventurers can enter the crater through a six- to eight-foot opening and descend into the Devil’s Kitchen by ladder.

 https://yellowstoneinsider.com/2016/05/23/old0yellowstone-history-the-devils-kitchen/

 Early Days

The Devil’s Kitchen was first described in 1872, in a report from the June 17 edition of The Avant Courier about discoveries on Mammoth Hot Springs: “The recent discoveries made by Mr. Chas. Millard of Fort Ellis on the property of the proprietors of the springs are the ‘Devil’s Parlor,’ the same gentleman’s ‘Well’ and his Majesty’s ‘Kitchen.’” (https://yellowstoneinsider.com/2016/05/23/old0yellowstone-history-the-devils-kitchen/

(At the time of the Devil’s Kitchen’s audacious plot to smuggle the Scepter of Dagobert out of France and into the American wilderness, Yellowstone had not yet been named as a national park and the Devil’s Kitchen badland was known only to Native Americans. European fur traders may have been active in the area in the late 17 00s, but information is sketchy. American fur traders have been traced to the mid-1800s. https://yellowstone.net/history/the-fur-trade-era-1818-42/)

Yellowstone itself became the world’s first national part only three months before. It wasn’t until 1884 when Devil’s Kitchen itself became a full-blown tourist attraction after a tour operator built a ladder for climbers to descend to its bottom. A. B. Guptill described the experience at that time: “The peculiar damp and heated atmosphere of the interior produces a queer sensation and the desire to seek fresh air at once comes over the visitor. When the Devil’s Kitchen was first explored (in 1881) numerous bones of wild animals were found in the cave and it was alive with the flying bat.” (https://yellowstoneinsider.com/2016/05/23/old0yellowstone-history-the-devils-kitchen/

The Devil’s Kitchen was so popular in the early 1920s that an ice cream and soda pop stand—The Devil’s Kitchenette--was set up nearby. Nevertheless, many visitors, like Edwin James Stanley, considered it to be off limits.  In his travelogue Rambles in Wonderland, Stanley explained why he remained on the precipice of the cavern. “Certain portions of the mountain also abound in caverns which were once the scene of boiling reservoirs. One of these has been partly explored, and is known as the ‘Devil’s Kitchen;’ but, meeting at the entrance a volume of the warm, sickening atmosphere, I desisted from further explorations. It was a gloomy, dismal place, and we could see little bats flitting to and fro, after the stones that we dropped in. In one of these caverns I saw the skeleton of a young deer or elk, which, in its playful gambols, had gone too near and fallen in and perished.” (yellowstoneinsider)

Passage down to the floor of the cavern was considered to be safe at the time. But photographer Frank J. Haynes did note a “queer sensation” at the base of the incline, less likely to be due to queasiness about piles of bones and bats flitting overhead than to limited fresh air and an overall feeling of suffocation. The area in fact was closed in 1939 because of dangerous levels of carbon dioxide in the cave. (yellowstoneinsider)

Murder Site

Deaths have occurred on the grounds of Yellowstone National Park, but not in high numbers, and few involving murder. From 2007 to 2023, 74 deaths have been recorded. Most were the result of driving accidents (45 percent); 38 percent happened while hiking, walking, climbing or playing sports. (https://www.becklawyers.com/deaths-in-yellowstone-national-park/

 Other national parks are considered to be more dangerous. A survey by Outforia found the Grand Canyon at the top of the list for deaths, with 134. Yosemite was second with 126 deaths, then came the Great Smoky Mountains, 92 deaths, and Yellowstone, with 52 deaths out of a total of 4 million annual visitors. (https://cowboystatedaily.com/2022/03/21/yellowstone-at-150-scaldings-maulings-murders-and-other-unnatural-deaths/

 Falls were the most common cause of death in all parks (245), followed by medical and natural causes (192), and undetermined (166). In Yellowstone, the most common cause of death was motor vehicle accidents (12) and heart attacks (12). (cowboystatedaily)

 And murders? One in one report of deaths in national parks (https://www.becklawyers.com/deaths-in-yellowstone-national-park/, 8 in another (cowboystatedaily).

 Yellowstone National Park is not the only nature preserve to house a Devil’s Kitchen. Lassen Volcanic Park in California also has one. Then there are Devil’s Canyons (in Bighorn Canyon National Recreational Area and North Cascades National Park), Devil’s Dens (one in Yellowstone), a Devil’s Garden, Devil’s Golf Course (in Death Valley), Devil’s Hole (also in Death Valley), and Devil’s Stairway (Yellowstone). There are more than 30 hellish geological configurations in national parks and recreational areas.  https://www.nationalparkstraveler.org/2018/11/hell-place-devils-role-national-park-place-names

  Sources:

 https://cowboystatedaily.com/2022/03/21/yellowstone-at-150-scaldings-maulings-murders-and-other-unnatural-deaths/

 https://www.becklawyers.com/deaths-in-yellowstone-national-park/,

 (https://yellowstoneinsider.com/2016/05/23/old0yellowstone-history-the-devils-kitchen/

 https://www.bighornbasindinos.org/devilskitchen)

 https://markthielman.com/the-devils-kitchen-2/

https://historicalnovelsociety.org/reviews/the-devils-kitchen-a-murder-in-yellowstone-the-johnson-and-nance-mysteries-1/

 https://usa-travelcenter.de/discoveramerica/wbb/wbb2/index.php?thread/17393-devils-kitchen-geological-site-greybull-wy/)

 https://www.geowyo.com/devils-kitchen.html

  https://www.yellowstonepark.com/things-to-do/natural-wonders/artist-point/

 https://www.yellowstonepark.com/things-to-do/natural-wonders/artist-point/

 



Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

The Devil’s Kitchen--France

Artist Jacques-Louis David is sketching the serpent Ouroboros, its mouth tearing at its own tail. Apropos, he thinks, of France in its time of revolution, a time when the nation is feeding on itself. He is listening to his wife Charlotte talk about the “finger of god,” the oldest of the monarchy’s crown jewels, the relic that carries the force of St. Eligius’ touch.

And he recalls January, 1794, when he and Maximilien Robespierre watched a prisoner bound to a board that was lowered until it was horizontal, clicking as it passed each of the seams in the wood “like snapping teeth” and then heard the thud of the blade and the cheers of the crowd as a traitor to the Republic was brought to justice.

Robespierre worried at the time about the “relics of the failed regime,” the “jewels of a faded king.” They all must be found, he told David, especially the oldest of the crown jewels, the Scepter of Dagobert, the golden carved staff that was forged in the 7th Century and had been hidden by the Royalists. “We will find it,” he said. “We will turn over every hovel, every pigsty until this symbol of royal oppression is located.”

Charlotte now hints to David that she knows where the scepter is and then tells him about an audacious plot—the plan to secretly move the staff out of the country, first to Louisiana and then to the farthest corner of the American frontier, to Devil’s Land on the banks of the Yellow Rock River.

The Devil’s Kitchen tells of that plan, moving back and forth in time from late 1700s’ France to modern-day Yellowstone National Park where some are still looking for the Scepter of Dagobert. This blog post travels more than 200 years into the past and the days of the French Revolution. The next post slips back in time from 2025 to the early days of Yellowstone National Park. 

The Scepter of Dagobert

The object at the center of intrigue in The Devil’s Kitchen, the Scepter of Dagobert, was one of the most iconic symbols of French royal authority and, as such, a target of artists, peasants, and Revolutionaries who sought to destroy monuments to France’s feudal past.

Made of enameled and filigreed gold, the scepter was 56 cm long, the rod was topped by a carved hand cupping a globe of the world, and at its apex, a dove.

The scepter was created during the reign of Dagobert I, a Merovingian king who consolidated Frankish lands and fostered devotion to the Christian faith during his ten-year reign—629 to 639. Used in official ceremonies, such as coronations, the scepter epitomized the power and authority of the king. It bore royal as well as religious significance, reflecting the divine right of kings, the belief that kings were appointed by god to rule and promote the spread of Christianity, and the melding of church and state.

In the late 1700s, the scepter was viewed as a relic from a time of oppression, a despised mark of the monarchy that was reviled by iconoclasts. It was only one of millions of objects targeted for destruction during the French Revolution when the iconoclasts set out to eliminate visual representations of the Catholic Church and the realms that came before the French Revolution—the Ancien Regime.

The French Revolution and the Iconoclasts

Although tensions were high as early as 1775, the start of the French Revolution was linked to the storming of the Bastille in July, 1789. In the next few years, feudalism (1789) and the nobility (1791) were abolished, the monarchy was overthrown (1792), and the king was executed (1793).

During this time, churches and monasteries as well as properties owned by the clergy and aristocracy were nationalized quickly and haphazardly. “Priests were removed from their property, monasteries were turned into stables for animals that shat in the space medieval altars once occupied, filth coated frescoes made centuries before, and crowds in the grips of a secular iconoclasm tore down and burned religious items.” (Thomas Lecaque: Revolutionary Material Culture Series)

Iconoclasts took specific action against “incarnations of the monarchy [that] obstructed man’s liberation.” (Frederique Baumgartner: Rethinking Revolutionary Vandalism in Iconoclasts and Vandals). In 1790, artists petitioned the king to order the destruction of all feudal monuments, and the National Assembly on June 19 passed the first iconoclast decree, which resulted in the partial dismantling of the statue of Louis XIV. Ironically, the commission for the protection of monuments was created in 1790, and the Museum of the Louvre opened on the first anniversary of the fall of the monarchy. Yet royal statues and monuments continued to be mutilated in what’s been called the Iconoclasm of Year II.

In 1792, peasants tore down feudal monuments on their own, prompting the legislature to pass a law that mandated such action and leading to the felling of the statue of Louis XIV in the Place des Victoires.  In 1793, state-sponsored vandalism targeted Notre Dame Cathedral--statues mistakenly believed to be monuments to previous kings were decapitated, the treasury was ransacked, artifacts were looted, desecrated, or burnt--and the royal tombs in the Basilica of Saint-Denis were looted. (Iconoclasm during the French Revolution,  Wikipedia)

Vandalism peaked during the Reign of Terror, from September 1793 to July 1794, when tens of thousands of people were massacred, publically executed, or died in prison as enemies of the new French Republic. Iconoclasm declined significantly in 1795, when the new government, called the Directory, instituted a nationwide plebiscite and granted amnesty to political prisoners. Iconoclastic practices ended in 1801 when Emperor Napoleon and the Catholic Church approved the Concordat, redefined the role of the church in the country, and outlawed the confiscation of church property.

What Was Saved

Some monuments to the church and France’s historic past escaped the iconoclasts. Sculptures and other artistic materials were gathered in a former convent on the left bank of the Seine by Alexandre Lenoir. (Paintings were sent to the Louvre.)

https://collections.louvre.fr/en/ark:/53355/cl010066527

 Labeled an “undistinguished painter” in 1790, Lenoir was named director of a depot of material obtained from religious institutions by the National Assembly and the mayor of Paris. As such, he “plunder[ed] before the plunderers, taking things apart before the mob did.” (Christopher M. Greene: Alexandre Lenoir and the Musée des monuments français during the French Revolution, French Historical Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2 (Autumn 1981), pp. 200–222, Duke University Press)

 Lenoir helped protect works of art and history and was wounded at least once while trying to stop the corpse of Cardinal Richelieu from being mutilated in the Sorbonne chapel. “He didn’t succeed—soldiers displayed what remained of Richelieu’s head on a pike to the appreciative crowd—but he did eventually get the tomb itself transferred to the depot.” He also covered bronze statues with “grayish distemper” to disguise them as marble and prevent them from being melted down for bullets. (Greene)

 What Was Lost

Manuscripts and written records prior to the French Revolution suffered the most losses by iconoclasts. One scholar estimated that more than four million volumes were taken away from monasteries and burned, including 25,000 medieval manuscripts. (Lecaque)

It was no wonder, he observed: “These documents were the legal justification of the privileged to rule over the peasantry and urban underclass, and when rebels burned them they were using similar intellectual justification to Tyler Durden’s [the character played by Brad Pitt and his] plot in [the 1999 film] Fight Club: a destruction of the debt and the control over their lives through a sudden, cataclysmic violence against the records. The Revolution was the greatest of these, though there were near-contemporary preambles in the south [of France]. In the 1780s, rioters in the Cevennes, Vivarais, and the Gévaudan all broke into law courts and the homes of notaries and attorneys and attempted to burn the deeds and contracts—a decade later, their attempts would be sanctioned by the revolutionary regime.” (Lecaque)

Major monuments also were destroyed. Among the most notable, Lecaque reported, were: “’The statue of Notre-Dame of Puy, which in early times attracted many foreigners, among whom were illustrious kings, and which considerably favored the economy of the town, was ripped from the main altar of the cathedral on the 30 Nivose of year II of the Republic (January 19 1794), and transported into the archives of the cathedral.” The famous ‘Black Madonna’ statue of the cathedral, was stripped of its jewels and left inside. The statue and the archives shared a similar fate: on June 8th, Pentecost of 1794, soldiers, police, the revolutionary head of the Haute-Loire, the mayor, and others took the statue and put it into a fire in front of the hôtel-de-ville, alongside ‘a quantity of papers called ‘feudals’ and others remembering ancient events. This operation was done to cries of ‘Long live the Republic!’” and forever eliminated the cathedral’s historical archives as well as its principal relic. (Lecaque)   

As for the Scepter of Dagobert? It disappeared from the Basilica of Saint-Denis, the resting place for many French kings, in 1795.

 Sources:

 Christopher M. Greene: Alexandre Lenoir and the Musée des monuments français during the French Revolution, French Historical Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2 (Autumn 1981), pp. 200–222, Duke University Press

geofrevolutions.com/2019/04/29/archives-lost-the-french-revolution-and-the-destruction-of-medieval-french-manuscripts/

Thomas Lecaque: “Revolutionary Material Culture Series,” April 29, 2019.

Matthew Wills: Wikimedia Commons, June 1, 2024

 https://www.britannica.com/event/French-Revolution/The-Directory-and-revolutionary-expansion

https://www.britannica.com/place/France/The-Napoleonic-era

https://www.britannica.com/event/Concordat-of-1801

Saving Art from the Revolution, for the Revolution: Alexandre Lenoir’s Musée des monuments français, founded to protect French artifacts from the revolutionary mobs, was one of the first popular museums of Europe.

 

Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

Fall Fires

The harsh smell, pealing bells, and pounding on the door of his chambers in Lincoln’s Inn awakens lawyer and government spy John Grey. It is September 2, 1666, and it is the first day of the Great Fire of London. On his way to meet his employer, Secretary of State Lord Arlington, Grey turns a corner and nearly stumbles over two men, one covered in smut, a scarf across his face, who backs into the shadows, turns, and runs away. The other lies dead, a large musket wound in his back. But when Arlington later sends men to investigate, the body is gone, leading Grey to launch inquiries—one into the identity of the dead man and his assailant, the other into the possible causes of the fire and the one who is responsible.

Fire, fourth in the John Grey Historical Mystery Series set in the mid- to late-1600s, takes readers to the edges of the inferno where sparks the size of dinner plates swirl while water wheels burn, pipes have gone dry, and firefighters bemoan: “There’s no fighting it.”

(For this and other of this author’s review, see: https://historicalnovelsociety.org/reviewer/k-m-sandrick/

https://www.walmart.com/ip/John-Grey-Fire-Paperback-9781631942914/1862781585

 The fire of 1666 was not the first to lay waste much of London. The city was first destroyed by fire in AD 60. Another “Great Fire” occurred in 1212. Fire destroyed houses along London Bridge in 1633, caused extensive damage across the city in 1643, and engulfed Tower Street in 1650 after gunpowder storage barrels exploded.

But the 1666 blaze is considered to be one of the most famous city fires in history, second only to the Great Chicago Fire 200 years later.

London and Chicago

The Great Fires in these cities have many similarities:

·         Both began in early autumn and were driven by days of drought and strong winds. The fire of London began in the early morning hours of September 2 after a long, hot summer with weeks of little to no rain, and it was propelled by a blustery East wind. The Great Fire of Chicago began at 9:00 pm on October 8, 1871 after the hot, dry summer had dried up much of the city’s water supplies. A 30-mile-an-hour wind powered flames from the west side northward, even lifting flames over a branch of the Chicago River.

·         Both cities were fodder for the spread of fire. London’s streets were narrow with parched wooden houses crammed close together.  To accommodate the rapidly increasing population, Chicago’s houses were hastily constructed of timber from nearby woodlands. Sidewalks, sewage systems, and streets were also made of wood.  

·         Firefighting was hampered by disorganized, haphazard, or largely absent fire departments. London had no designated firefighters or water hoses. The firefighting ordinance at the time required every parish to have a fire kit—a leather basket handing on a hook—plus ladders, leather buckets, axes and “fire hooks” for pulling down buildings. So-called bellmen who walked the streets watching for fires raised the alarm when they spotted a dangerous blaze. Church bells rang to notify local residents, and people in the neighborhood gathered together to pass buckets of water and douse the flames.  Chicago sent firefighters to the scene of the Great Fire, but they had few operating hydrants to draw from. Hydrants were scattered, dry, or misfiring, the existing waterworks system could not deliver water citywide, and there were no steam-powered fire engines at the time.

Rumors or myths attached to the fires in each city. Chicago’s blaze is famously blamed on Mrs. O’Leary’s cow. The first flames did originate from or near Patrick and Catherine O’Leary’s barn on De Koven Street on the West Side. But as for the cow as the perpetrator? An inebriated neighbor, milk thieves, or vandals could have triggered the sparks. Other causes? A meteor shower and divine punishment were bandied about. The first sign of combustion in London was in the bakery of the King’s Baker, Thomas Farriner, on Puddington Lane near London Bridge or close by, in Fyer Yard. Once the flames had been stanched, there was plenty of blame to go around: The Mayor of London for not acting more quickly. Catholics and Frenchmen for being, well, Catholics and French. The Dutch as revenge for the English attack on Dutch Island Terschelling and Vlieland a month before.

The Fires by the Numbers

Total area burned: 1 and one-half mile along the length and one-half mile along the width of London. Three and three-tenths miles across the city of Chicago.

Total number of buildings destroyed: 13,200 houses in London. 17,000 buildings in Chicago.

Number of people left homeless: 100,000 in both cities.

Cost of the damage: 10 million pounds, 200 million dollars.

Number of people killed: six in London, between 250 and 350 in Chicago.

Fire intensity: The temperature across the city of London during the fire was estimated as greater than 3092 degrees Fahrenheit. The fire in Chicago was so intense it generated its own weather systems, including tornadoes.

 So What Happened?

https://www.london-fire.gov.uk/museum/london-fire-brigade-history-and-stories/fires-and-incidents-that-changed-history/the-great-fire-of-london/

Sunday, September 2, 1666: Flames were first detected at 1:00 am in the bakery owned by Thomas Farriner. By 7:00 am, 300 homes had been destroyed. During the afternoon, 100 homes per hour were burning.

Monday, September 3: The Duke of York set up fire postings around the city and organized men into firefighting teams. At approximately 2:00 pm, the Royal Exchange in the city’s financial center caught fire. At 3:00 pm, gates to the city were closed to all incoming vehicles. Approximately half of the city was in flames by evening.

Tuesday, September 4: Both King Charles II and the Duke of York entered the city to give encouragement to the people fighting the fire. At 6:00 pm, the fire reached the Temple area; at 8:00 pm, St. Paul’s Cathedral ignited.

Wednesday, September 5: Whitehall was evacuated at 6:00 am. With flames dying down, the Duke of York brought people together to try to salvage court records from the chapel. Fires died down near Holborn Bridge at noon. Only one fire near Bishopsgate remained burning in the evening; it was extinguished in the early morning hours of September 6.

https://www.britannica.com/event/Chicago-fire-of-1871

 The Chicago fire was first detected at 9:00 pm on October 8, 1871, but the watchman gave the wrong location of the blaze, so no one arrived at the scene until 9:40. By 10:00 pm and continuing until midnight, the fire raged out of control.

Between midnight and 2:00 am on October 9, the gasworks exploded, leaving all residents without power. The courthouse ignited between 2:00 and 4:00 am, Michigan Avenue erupted in flames from 4:00 to 6:00, leading many people to wade into Lake Michigan to avoid the inferno. Buildings in the path of the fire were detonated between 10:00 and noon, yet the Northside was still burning at 6:00 pm. The fire slowly died down as rain drenched the city until midnight.

Rebuilding

Rebuilding was expected to begin in London within six to eight months. A royal proclamation on September 13 delayed reconstruction until new building regulations had been issued, however. The First Rebuilding Act was passed by parliament in February, 1667, and work began along 11 miles of city streets in March. By the end of that year, 800 buildings had been rebuilt. Nearly all buildings, between 12,000 to 15,000, were completed by 1688. Many of the new structures were built of stone or brick, and many streets were widened.

Rebuilding began almost immediately after the flames died out in Chicago and focused on fireproofing buildings, urban planning, fire prevention and safety, and the creation of a modern fire department, adding a top-level fire commissioner, steam-powered engines, more fire stations across the city, and better training for firefighters. The rebuilding effort advanced architecture, leading to the first skyscraper, the Home Insurance Building, in 1885. It also attracted leading architects of the time, including Dankmar Adler, Louis Sullivan, William Holabird and Martin Roache, leaders of the Chicago School style of architecture.

Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

Redress

More than 40 years after 120,000 Japanese Americans were rounded up and sent to internment camps far away from their homes, each of the camp’s survivors received a check for $20,000 and a letter from George H.W. Bush acknowledging that:

“A monetary sum and words alone cannot restore lost years or erase painful memories; neither can they convey our Nation’s resolve to rectify injustice and to uphold the rights of individuals. We can never fully right the wrongs of the past. But we can take a clear stand for justice and recognize that serious injustices were done to Japanese Americans during World War II.

“In enacting a law calling for restitution and offering a sincere apology, our fellow Americans have, in a very real sense, renewed their traditional commitment to the ideals of freedom, equality, and justice. You and your family have our best wishes for the future.” (Mitchell T. Maki: Achieving the Impossible Dream, University of Illinois Press, 1999.

A formal ceremony was held in the Great Hall of the Justice Department where Attorney General Richard Thornburgh presented elderly Japanese Americans representing the community as a whole with $20,000 in redress checks as well as the formal apology from the president. The checks and the apology were given to nine elderly, former internees at the ceremony on October 9, 1990.

https://www.nichibei.org/2013/02/a-look-back-at-the-historic-japanese-american-redress-movement/

Actions most Japanese Americans never expected to happen, an impossible dream, a dream that didn’t even begin to form in the minds of internment camp survivors until the 1970s. Then, in 1989, Japanese Americans finally received redress from the federal government.

The Beginning of the Story

Losses sustained by incarcerated Japanese Americans were first acknowledged in 1946. Two bills were introduced into the US House and Senate to create an evacuation claims commission that would pay for property that had been lost when Japanese citizens were excluded and removed from their homes on the West Coast.

 But it took two years before the proposed measures became law and set aside only $38 million to reimburse for lost property—a fraction of the total amount of property lost by Japanese Americans. (Much of the property had to be sold quickly for far less than market value. Total property losses were estimated to be $1.3 billion, and the overall loss in income was about $2.7 billion. https://www.japaneseamericanredress.org/historical-overview)

Even then, most internment camp survivors saw little in recompense: the legislation required proof of ownership and property loss—not exactly something Japanese Americans had time to acquire before they had to report for relocation within days of notification of internment and allowed only a single bag of their belongings. (Achieving the Impossible Dream, p 54)

And the program was hampered by red tape. The Department of Justice processed only 200 of more than 23,000 claims between 1946 and 1950. https://www.japaneseamericanredress.org/historical-overview

In addition to evacuation claims legislation, court cases in the late 1940s ruled that American citizens could not be imprisoned or repatriated if they renounced citizenship while incarcerated, and even after renouncing citizenship during incarceration, they could have their citizenship restored. Other cases ruled state laws that did not allow Japanese Americans to own land were unconstitutional, violating the equal protection clause. (Achieving the Impossible Dream)

The McCarran-Walter Act of 1952 for the first time made it possible for first-generation Japanese Americans to become citizens, and a Supreme Court ruling in 1967 allowed Japanese Americans to recover deposits from the Yokohama Specie Bank, whose assets were seized by the government in the early days of WW II. (Achieving the Impossible Dream)

But the formal redress movement did not begin until 1970 when a resolution introduced at the annual convention of the Japanese American Citizens League (JACL) called for reparations.

The Redress Movement

A resolution calling for reparations for Japanese Americans who had been interned during WW II was first introduced at the Japanese American Citizens League in 1970 and reaffirmed in 1972. The resolution called for $5 in compensation for every day of incarceration (the same amount paid to POWs) and limiting the total amount of reparations to $400 million.

Despite its popularity (80 percent of Japanese Americans supported the resolution), the first redress bill introduced in the US Congress in 1974 failed to get out of committee.

The JACL convention in 1976 made passing federal redress legislation a priority for the group and established the National Committee for Redress in 1978. A year later, the federal Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians (CWRIC) was authorized by Congress to pursue three goals:

·         Review the facts and circumstances surrounding the presidential executive order that excluded Japanese Americans from the West Coast and its effect on resident aliens.

·         Review the directives of the US military in relocating and detaining American citizens in internment camps.

·         Recommend appropriate remedies. (Achieving the Impossible Dream, p 96)

 The nine members of the federal commission held hearings in ten cities between July and December, 1981, as well as legislative hearings in Washington over two days, where members of Congress heard from Japanese Americans who had been interned as well as opponents of any form of redress. (Leslie T. Hatamiya: Righting a Wrong, Stanford University Press, 1993)

The Work of the CWRIC

The commission analyzed archival material, government documents, personal papers, and scholarly publications. Members heard testimony from 750 people, 500 who had themselves been interned, and heard how families had been separated, how poor medical care led to infection and sometimes death, and how difficult it was for the handicapped or mentally retarded to move about in common areas, such as latrines, laundry rooms, and mess halls. https://www.japaneseamericanredress.org/historical-overview

One woman recalled how she, as a child, thought about incarceration in Heart Mountain and tried to avoid the “truth”: “The truth was that the government we trusted, the country we loved, the nation to which we had pledged loyalty had betrayed us, had turned against us.” (Achieving the Impossible Dream, p 107)

 One of the strongest voices against redress was that of Lillian Baker, who formed Americans for Historical Accuracy in 1976 to work against reparations for Japanese Americans. She testified that internment camps had been "a military necessity" filled with "enemy aliens loyal to the Emperor of Japan." At the same time, she maintained that many in the camps were there "voluntarily," that there were "no machine guns in the guard towers," and the barbed wire fences "were to keep the cattle out, not the people in." Photos showing deplorable conditions in the camps, such as California’s Manzanar, were “doctored,” she said. https://www.japaneseamericanredress.org/historical-overview

“During her testimony in front of the CWRIC in Los Angeles,” writes Mitchell T. Maki, “over 200 Japanese Americans walked out in silent protest amid what a JACL newsletter at the time described as her ‘hysterical diatribes against evacuees.’ Her testimony aside, Baker is perhaps best remembered for the police escort she received out of the hearing after trying to incite an altercation with former internee and World War II veteran, James Kawanami, during his testimony. Kawanami served as president of the Southern California 442nd Veterans Association. The 442nd ranked as one of the most decorated units in World War II, and was composed entirely of Japanese American soldiers, many of whom were freed from the camps to serve in the war effort.” https://www.japaneseamericanredress.org/historical-overview

 The commission concluded in February, 1983, that President Roosevelt’s use of Executive Order 9066 to exclude and intern Japanese Americans was “not justified by military necessity.” The causes leading to exclusion and internment were “race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership. Widespread ignorance of Japanese Americans contributed to a policy conceived in haste and executed in an atmosphere of fear and anger at Japan. A grave injustice was done to American citizens and resident aliens of Japanese ancestry who, without individual review or any probative evidence against them, were excluded, removed, and detained by the United States during World War II.”

 Its recommendations, released on June 16, 1983, included a joint congressional resolution with the president’s signature that apologized for injustice, appropriated funds for research and public education about the Japanese American experience, restored “positions, status, or entitlements” that had been lost during the war, and allocated $1.5 billion to provide $20,000 to every survivor of evacuation and internment. (Achieving the Impossible Dream, p 111)

(The National Archives, photo no. 75856233)

After legislative to’s-and-fro’s over the next few years, President Ronald Reagan signed The Civil Liberties Act of 1988 into law. The law granted redress to Japanese Americans who had been interned during WW II. President George H.W. Bush signed the appropriations bill into law in 1989 that made redress for Japanese Americans an entitlement, and finally, in 1992, President Bush signed the law that ensured all eligible Japanese Americans would receive redress money and extended redress to non-Japanese spouses or parents who had been interned. (Righting a Wrong, Stanford University Press, 1993)

 Sources:

Mitchell T. Maki: Achieving the Impossible Dream, University of Illinois Press, 1999.

Leslie T. Hatamiya: Righting a Wrong, Stanford University Press, 1993

 https://www.japaneseamericanredress.org/historical-overview)

https://archive.org/details/japaneseamerican00unse_0

https://densho.org/catalyst/japanese-americans-demand-justice-long-overdue-at-1981-redress-hearings/

https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/redress-and-reparations-japanese-american-incarceration .

Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

The End of Detention

Even before the end of WW II, the US government was taking steps to eliminate internment camps and allow Japanese Americans to return to their homes on the West Coast. In 1943, detention of Japanese Americans was no longer considered “militarily necessary.” The Departments of the Interior, Justice, and War hoped to end the policy of excluding Japanese Americans from far western states as early as the spring of 1944. The US Navy got onboard in September, and the head of the US Army’s Western Defense Command (WDC), the military units responsible for defending the Pacific Coast from enemy attack, took the lead, exempting more than 1400 individual Japanese Americans from exclusion at the end of the year. (Kristen Hayashi: The Return of Japanese Americans to the West Coast, 1945, March 6, 2021; Brian Densho, Return to West Coast, https://encyclopedia.densho.org/Return_to_West_Coast/)

At the first Cabinet meeting following the general election in November, leaders of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s administration made the final decision, issuing Public Proclamation Number 21 on December 17 and setting January 2, 1945 as the date Japanese Americans could begin reentering the states of Washington, Oregon, and California. (Return to West Coast)

A key factor was the US Supreme Court decision in the case In re Mitsuye Endo 323 U.S. 283 that unanimously concluded the federal government could not indefinitely confine citizens of Japanese citizenry who were “concededly loyal.” (Greg Robinson, Université du Québec À Montréal, Ex parte Mitsuye Endo (1944)

The Endo Case

Mitsuye Endo was the daughter of Japanese immigrants. She was born in Sacramento, California, in 1920, graduated from Sacramento Senior High School and secretarial school, and got a clerical job with the California Department of Motor Vehicles. Soon after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Endo and other employees were fired.

 While Endo and her family were interned at the camp at Tule Lake and later Topaz, Utah, she along with 62 other dismissed employees challenged the decision by the state’s Personnel Board. She became lead plaintiff in a habeas corpus petition that challenged the exclusion of Japanese Americans and made it impossible for them to return to their jobs. The petition became a test case on behalf of second-generation Japanese people who were Christian, had never been to Japan, and could neither speak nor read Japanese. Endo not only met all three conditions, she had a brother in the U.S. Army. (Ex parte Mitsuye Endo)

Resettlement

Four to six train coaches each week began to leave the Heart Mountain (Wyoming) Japanese Relocation Center in 1945, carrying Japanese Americans away from internment and into Billings, Montana.

As internment camps started closing, internees were given $25 and a one-way ticket to their former home towns. (Michael T. Maki: How Japanese Americans Fought for—and Won—Redress for WW II Incarceration, April 20, 2022, updated January 31, 2025.

The process of returning Japanese Americans was nevertheless slow-going. Before the war, nearly 36,000 Japanese Americans lived in Los Angeles County. But only 300 returned a month after the territory was reopened in early 1945, and only 2000 relocated by the end of August. (The Return of Japanese Americans to the West Coast ).

Of the original 120,000 total number of internees in all internment camps, 55,000 Japanese were still incarcerated in April, 1945, and only 12,000 to 15,000 internees were expected to return to Los Angeles County by the end of the year. (Return of Japanese Americans; Return to West Coast)

A number of internees relocated relatively smoothly. Some still had a business, farm, or home they could return to and reclaim the property as their own. These included Japanese Americans who had arranged for caretakers to oversee their land or farms before leaving for camp, such as those who had lived in the agricultural areas of Cortez, Cressy, and Livingston, California, and those who operated the California Flower Market in San Francisco. Some took advantage of The War Relocation Authority’s 25 district offices that helped with resettlement. (Return to West Coast)

Others were called “scouts,” people willing to visit their home towns, look for available housing, assess the job market, and determine whether residents would welcome, or at least tolerate, Japanese people before they actually made the trip back home. (Return to West Coast)

But many had lost their property and belongings and could not return to the life they had known. Kristen Hayashi tells about one family. Kimiko Keimi and her 13-year-old son no longer had access to their home and the laundry they had managed before the war when they left the internment camp in Heart Mountain, Wyoming, in October, 1945. So they moved into a temporary trailer operated by the federal government until Kimiko found domestic work for a family in the San Fernando Valley, and she and her son could share a room in the family home. Kimiko’s older son Albert got room and board while working for a family in Hollywood and completing his senior year at Hollywood High School, and Kimiko’s husband moved in with other laborers working for the railroad in the Pacific Northwest. (Return of Japanese Americans)

While Japanese Americans could find temporary housing in hostels, hotels, or trailers, they often had difficulty finding and acquiring permanent housing because of restrictions on home purchases by Japanese and other people of color. (Return to West Coast)

There also was an overall shortage of adequate housing. Much of the land and property once owned by Japanese Americans were now slated for development as shopping centers or other development. And existing housing was in short supply because of high demand. Japanese Americans recently freed from internment were not the only housing seekers: Large numbers of migrants had relocated to work in Pacific Coast war industries over the last four years, and increasing numbers of GIs were returning from overseas. (Return of Japanese Americans, Return to West Coast)

Japanese Americans no longer had businesses or jobs they could return to, so many went into domestic work or turned to gardening until civil service and other employment opportunities opened up over time. (Return of Japanese Americans; Return to West Coast)   

Returning Japanese Americans also worried about discrimination and possible violence. Although most were able to return without incident, there were reports of shots being fired into returnees’ homes, arson attempts, terrorist threats, and vandalism. (Return to West Coast)

The Beginning and the End

Between March and November, 1942, everyone of Japanese heritage was evacuated from the state of California and parts of Arizona, Oregon, and Washington and moved to one of ten internment camps in Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Utah, or Wyoming.

The War Department rescinded its orders for exclusion and detention of Japanese Americans in December, 1944, and beginning in January, 1945, internees were released and sent home.

The last internment camp closed on March 20, 1946. (Leslie T. Hatamiya, Righting a Wrong, Stanford University Press, 1993)

The Cost

”The losses sustained by Japanese Americans were great,” writes Leslie T. Hatamiya in Righting a Wrong. Wartime property losses, estimated by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, topped $400 million in 1942. Professional careers and educational advancement were disrupted or lost.

Beyond business, there were heavy personal losses. “As families fell apart, individuals lost their self-esteem and pride—two characteristics important in Japanese culture. But most significantly, Japanese Americans suffered the indignity of being falsely imprisoned by their own government. They had been innocent victims in a racist episode that betrayed the very principles on which the United States was founded.” (Righting a Wrong, p 25)

 The Japanese American community did not silently accept these losses over the long term. Beginning in 1970, the Japanese American Citizens League resolved to seek redress. See the next Time Stamp

 Sources

 Brian Niiya , Densho, Return to West Coast, https://encyclopedia.densho.org/Return_to_West_Coast/)

 Greg Robinson , Université du Québec À Montréal, Ex parte Mitsuye Endo (1944)

Leslie T. Hatamiya: Righting a Wrong, Stanford University Press, 1993)

Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

Alien Enemies in 1942

In early 1942, the body of strawberry farmer Tadeo Suzuki is found on the rocks beneath the Bluff near San Ignacio, California, his clothes drenched in alcohol, a flashlight nearby.

Police are unsympathetic investigators. Suzuki was probably a spy, wasn’t he? Isn’t that why Japanese, many of whom American citizens, are being rounded up, their land and possessions confiscated, they and their families sent to internment camps hundreds of miles away?  

In The Cry of Cicadas, latest in the Max Byrns detective mysteries series, author J. Stanley Jones intersperses the rising hostility against and suspicion of Japanese citizens within Byrns’ step-by-step investigative police procedurals as he, wife Elizabeth, and son Philip, on leave from the U.S. military, move from situation to situation and suspect to suspect to find Tadeo’s killer. In less than two months after the attack on Pearl Harbor, residents of San Ignacio are openly fearful that “the enemy is loose all around us” and that their Japanese neighbors are a danger to national security. Assaults and beatings soon follow, leaving one unconscious man with a sign on his chest: “Go Home, Japs.” (For this author’s review of the novel, see: https://historicalnovelsociety.org/reviews/the-cry-of-cicadas-a-byrns-on-the-homefront-mystery/)

President Franklin D. Roosevelt has already taken steps against possible enemies who may be living in the US. On December 7, 1941, he issued Presidential Proclamation 2525, authorizing the US government to “apprehend, restrain, secure, and remove natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation of Japan as alien enemies.” (https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/proclamation-2525-alien-enemies-japanese)

The following day, he issued two other proclamations—2526 and 2527—for Germans and Italians living in the US. (https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/analysis-presidential-proclamation-2526-alien-enemies-germans; https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/proclamation-2527-internment-italian-americans)

Executive Order 9066 came next, the order that led to mass apprehension and internment of Japanese Americans living on the West Coast.

The proclamations and Executive Order issued by Franklin Roosevelt were offshoots of the Alien Enemies Act, the law enacted in 1798 that gives US presidents the power to apprehend, detain, and deport individuals from foreign nations considered to be hostile to America at a time of war or invasion. The act has been invoked only three times in American history—during the War of 1812 with Great Britain, World War I, and World War II.

The Alien Enemies Act is controversial today because it is being cited as the basis for President Donald Trump’s executive orders that categorize drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations and allow law enforcement to apprehend, detain, and deport individuals labeled as members of those cartels. The Alien Enemies Act is being used by Trump and his administration in the absence of an actual declaration of war or invasion by a hostile foreign nation. Law enforcement is using the law to deny due process, a core tenet of the US Constitution, and stop detainees from being able to respond to charges, mount a defense, and seek redress in a court of law.

This Time Stamp post describes use of the Alien Enemies Act in the 1940s against Japanese Americans.  

THE ENEMY ALIEN CONTROL PROGRAM

Immediately after the release of Proclamations 2525, 2526, and 2527 in 1941, the FBI and other law enforcement agencies began arresting suspected enemy aliens of German, Italian, and Japanese ancestry. The Justice Department processed each case before a local alien enemy hearing board and released or pardoned many who had no clear ties to enemy governments or actions. Others, often with little more than unsubstantiated accusations or weak evidence, were sent to Immigration and Naturalization Services’ internment camps, where some were held for the duration of the war and beyond. (Overview of the Enemy Alien Control Program)

EXECUTIVE ORDER 9066

Then, on February 19, 1942, President Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066. This order classified the West Coast of California as a war zone from which “any and all persons could be excluded,” and it triggered the mass relocation of more than 11,000 Japanese residents and internment in Manzanar, a 5500-acre agricultural and housing camp between the Sierra Nevada and Inyo mountain ranges of Owens Valley.  (Overview of the World War II Enemy Alien Control Program) 

The US War Department also considered expelling ethnic Germans and Italians from coastal areas but did not do so because of the large number of individuals involved, more than 11 million people were German born themselves or one or both parents were German. Twelve thousand German Americans nevertheless were interned some time during the course of the war. (German American Internment)  Hundreds of Italian Americans were sent to internment camps, and more than 10,000 were forced from their homes, their possessions confiscated, and hundreds of thousands were under surveillance or curfew. (https://www.history.com/articles/italian-american-internment-persecution-wwii)

Internment

Within days of signing Executive Order 9066, Japanese Americans were ordered to prepare for their removal from California: pack up whatever belongings they could carry themselves, then store, sell, or give the rest to friends or family. The result for Japanese business owners was full liquidation of business inventory. For Japanese farmers, it meant sale or leasing of their farmland for pennies on the dollar or outright abandonment. For all Japanese, it meant reporting for incarceration in the next seven to 10 days. (https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/july-26/united-states-freezes-japanese-assets)

Members of each family received an identification number before being loaded into buses, cars, trains, or trucks and transported under military guard to an assembly center where they waited until their new lodgings were completed. For Japanese Americans in California, that was Manzanar. (https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/july-26/united-states-freezes-japanese-assets)

https://ddr.densho.org/ddr-densho-151-64/

Over 500 acres, 504 barracks were organized into 36 blocks. The entire Manzanar complex was surrounded by barbed wire with eight guard towers mounted by searchlights and patrolled by military police. Two hundred to 400 hundred people lived in each block. Each barrack had four rooms, open men’s and women’s toilets and showers, a laundry, and mess hall. Rooms had a single hanging light bulb for illumination, an oil heating stove, and each resident was given a cot, straw mattress, and blanket. (Life at Manzanar, Japanese American Confinement Sites Consortium, JACSC)

Until the final internee was released in 1945, residents tended agricultural fields, raised cattle, chickens, and hogs, made clothes and furniture for themselves and camouflage netting and experimental rubber for the military. On their own, managers of barracks blocks established churches and temples and clubs for boys and girls, developed dance, music, sports, and other recreational programs, created gardens and ponds, and published their own newspaper. (JACSC)

Spies?

Mass incarceration was justified at the time because of fears that Japanese residents were spying on military targets. Yet the 1983 Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians found that there was no “military necessity” for internment. It was caused instead by “race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership.”

Critics accused the commission of ignoring reports of a growing number of Japanese-American spies revealed in secret coded messages that were declassified in 1978—the so-called MAGIC intercepts.

MAGIC was the code name for a collection of 4000 diplomatic messages between the Japanese government in Tokyo and Japanese embassies and consulates that were intercepted, decoded, and given to US cabinet and military leaders in early 1941.  One cable in May, 1941, reported plans to keep close watch on airplane manufacturing plants and military establishments and claimed to have reliable espionage contacts in San Pedro and San Diego. (U.S. knew of Japanese-American spies, Washington Times, May 31, 1983)

Analysts and historians dismiss the notion of a large-scale espionage effort along the West Coast, noting that the MAGIC cables were more wishful thinking than an actual intelligence operation. (One cable, for instance, acknowledged “we are doing everything in our power to establish outside contacts in our efforts to gather intelligence material,” and it expressed concern about “Japanese persons whom we can’t trust completely.” (Brian Niiya, Magic cables, Densho)

Submarines?

Fears of Japanese residents as spies were fueled by a number of submarine sightings and attacks in the months after Pearl Harbor. Nine Japanese submarines gathered along the San Francisco coast in late December, 1941, with the aim of attacking the city beginning on Christmas Day. But the attack never happened. It was initially postponed until December 27, then called off completely because the submarines were critically short of fuel. (Steven D. Lutz: Target: American’s West Coast)

The freighter Absaroka was torpedoed by a Japanese sub near Los Angeles on Christmas Eve, 1941, but the ship was not sunk, and almost all crew members were rescued. The Ellwood Richfield Oil Company refinery and storage facility in Redondo Beach was bombarded by a Japanese submarine on February 23, 1942, but most of the shells missed their target or landed as duds.

Early the next morning, the San Pedro Naval Operations Base sent three planes and two destroyers and dropped depth charges into the sea near Point Vincente. Air raid wardens ordered people to take shelter and douse lights while shrapnel fell onto homes and autos in Santa Monica and Long Beach. The impetus? Nothing more than a runaway weather balloon. (Steven D. Lutz: Target: America’s West Coast)

Reports that freighters had been sunk and attacks had been made on oilfields, cities, and towns were no more than flights of fancy. “In the end, Japan never had the time, opportunity, or resources to launch a major offensive effort against the continental United States. (Lutz: Target American’s West Coast)

Next time on Time Stamp: Japanese Americans after the war, the long road to reparations.

 Sources:

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/instant-articles/internment-of-germans.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment_of_German_Americans

https://www.jacsc.org/

 (https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/july-26/united-states-freezes-japanese-assets

https://encyclopedia.densho.org/Magic_cables/

https://densho.org/

https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/target-americas-west-coast/

(https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/proclamation-2525-alien-enemies-japanese)

(https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/analysis-presidential-proclamation-2526-alien-enemies-germans; https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/proclamation-2527-internment-italian-americans)

https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/executive-order-9066

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commission_on_Wartime_Relocation_and_Internment_of_Civilians     

Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

Abe Lincoln in Fact and Fiction

On Presidents’ Day, 2025, visitors to the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia can meet and greet, interact with professional historical reenactors, and ask historic presidents about their lives, impact on history, and their time as leaders of the United States. They can enter a voting booth and vote for their favorite historic president and display their knowledge of the nation’s commanders in chief in Presidential Trivia. (https://constitutioncenter.org/calendar/presidents-day-2025)

In Land of Lincoln, Springfield, IL, visitors to the Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum can take journeys with Abraham Lincoln and learn about his early life in a Kentucky cabin, his campaign for the presidency in 1860, his leadership during the Civil War, the death of his son Willie in 1862, and his assassination in 1865. Or they can download Lincoln Unlocked and take interactive tours using augmented reality and digital storytelling, see rare artifacts and photos, and find profiles of historic figures. (For more information, visit PresidentLincoln.illinois.gov or follow ALPLM on Facebook, X and Instagram.) Or they can Experience Abraham Lincoln in the Union Theater through the special feature, Lincoln’s Eyes, an immersive, special effects film that tells about Lincoln’s life and death. (https://presidentlincoln.illinois.gov/Event/25546/Special-Performance-of-Freedom-in-Form-Nine-Vignettes-for-Richard-Hunt/event-details/)

In Chicago at the Chicago History Museum, children, teens, and adults can write a letter to today’s president, decide how they themselves would mount a campaign for the office of the presidency, and leave messages about current issues they think are most important and how to address them before walking through the Lincoln exhibit.

https://learningoosterzonbmrq.z21.web.core.windows.net/free-printable-abraham-lincoln-pictures.html

Abraham Lincoln died more than 150 years ago, yet he and his life are still major topics of interest. Just consider the number of books published in the last few years and those planned for this year.

 Among the nonfiction books published between 2020 and 2023 are:

Abraham among the Yankees: Abraham Lincoln’s 1848 Visit to Massachusetts

The Agitator and the Politician: William Lloyd Garrison, Abraham Lincoln, and the Emancipation of the Slaves

Salmon P. Chase: Lincoln’s Vital Rival

The Lincoln Miracle: Inside the Republican Convention that Changed History

Books published in 2024 include these about Lincoln and his time:

Abraham Lincoln: Statesman Historian

Wide Awake: The Forgotten Force that Elected Lincoln and Spurred the Civil War

Our Ancient Faith: Lincoln, Democracy, and the American Experiment

Lincoln vs. Davis: The War of the Presidents

Brought Forth on This Continent: Abraham Lincoln and American Immigration

Black Americans in Mourning: Reactions to the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln

The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the Dawn of the Civil War

Freedom Was in Sight: A Graphic History of Reconstruction in the Washington, DC, Region

Decade of Disunion: How Massachusetts and South Carolina Led the Way to the Civil War

 Already scheduled for publication in 2025 are:

The Pathfinder and the President: John C. Fremont, Abraham Lincoln, and the Battle for Emancipation

Loving Lincoln: A Personal History of the Women Who Shaped Lincoln’s Life and Legacy.  

Radical Republican and Champion of Democracy

Righteous Strife

Among the most recent fiction titles are:

https://www.amazon.com/Rail-Splitter-Novel-John-Cribb/dp/1645720640

The 2023 novel seeks to understand Abraham Lincoln the man by learning about Abe Lincoln the boy. Rail Splitter begins with Abe’s father worries about his 17-year-old son. He frets that the teen is heading down the wrong path, fooling around with more education than he needs instead of putting his back into a piece of land and turning it into something useful. Young Abraham himself is not sure what path he will follow, but he’s sure of one thing: it won’t involve owning a farm. See this author’s full review at: https://historicalnovelsociety.org/reviews/the-rail-splitter/

The novel is the prequel to author John Cribb’s 2020 novel Old Abe, which tells the story of the last five years of Lincoln’s life, beginning with his election to the White House and passing through the dark days of the Civil War and his tragic death.

https://www.amazon.com/Old-Abe-Novel-John-Cribb/dp/1645720160

It’s estimated that between 15,000 and 20,000 books have been written about Abraham Lincoln. Here are a few of them.

Best Sellers and Classics

One of the most recent nonfiction books about Lincoln is a nationwide best-seller. The Demon of Unrest has sold more than 10 million copies since its publishing date April, 2024. The book covers the first five months of Lincoln’s presidency, from inauguration to the raising of the Confederate flag at Fort Sumter, plumbs the diary of a plantation owner, and highlights the actions of a military leader at the fort, a nearly rabid secessionist, and the country’s Secretary of State. 

Chorus of the Union, published in June, 2024, delves into the rivalry between Lincoln and Stephen Douglas, beginning with their debates for the US Senate in 1858 and their runs for the presidency in 1860.

Doris Kearns Goodwin’s Team of Rivals, published in 2005, remains one of the most popular and well-regarded books about the Lincoln presidency. Chronicling the campaigns of the men who ran against Lincoln—William Seward, Salmon P. Chase, and Edward Bates—and their addition to Lincoln’s Cabinet, the book is rated among the top 500 on the all-time list of Civil War biographies and was made into the movie Lincoln by director Stephen Spielberg.

On the fiction side, Lincoln at the Bardo by George Saunders, the 2017 novel about Lincoln and the death of his son Willie, won the 2023 Library of Congress Prize for American Fiction.

Impeachment, a work of alternate history by Stephen L. Carter posits that Lincoln survived the assassination attempt but then was put on trial by the US Congress after the war because of what congressmen considered to be his questionable and unconstitutional use of presidential authority. The book won the Kirkus Prize in 2012.

Sci-Fi and Not-so-Fi

Abe Lincoln, Vampire Hunter, sandwiches in actual events in Lincoln’s life with a series of imaginative adventures on the trail of the undead. The book by Seth Grahame-Smith appeared in 2010 and was made into a movie in 2012.

In the 2024 Jack the Ripper and Abraham Lincoln, author Tony McMahon describes the link between Lincoln’s assassination and the Whitechapel killings by Jack the Ripper, less than 25 years later. It’s Francis Tumblety, a doctor who was arrested but soon released following the assassination, a man who was later imprisoned but then escaped because of his suspected involvement in the Ripper killings.

The 2022 Lincoln: The Fire of Genius by David J. Kent highlights little-known, at least for this reader, aspects of Lincoln’s life: his own patent and his legal cases as a patent attorney, his work as a state legislator to foster technological advancement, his support for the Smithsonian Institution, creation of the National Academy of Sciences, and use of the latest in weaponry, telegraphy, and balloon surveillance during the Civil War.

 Legal Cases

Lincoln’s Greatest Case, published in 2016, traces one of the lawsuits Lincoln defended as an attorney. Author Brian McGinty tells the story of the crash of the steamboat Effie Afton into a pillar of the Rock Island Bridge during its construction across the Mississippi River in 1856 and explains how the lawsuit influenced the development of the nation’s infrastructure.

Lincoln’s Last Trial by TV host Dan Abrams describes Lincoln’s defense of Peachy Quinn Harrison, the son of a friend and political supporter who was accused of the murder of Lincoln’s own law clerk, mentee, and friend and the high stakes surrounding the lawsuit—a loss at this stage of Lincoln’s life, when he was being considered as a possible dark horse candidate, could have put an end to his political life.

The Personal Side

In the early 2000s, several books examined Lincoln’s private moments and relationships.

Lincoln’s Melancholy reveals Lincoln’s bouts of deep depression and the ways he tried to cope with them in a combination of historical record research, interviews with Lincoln scholars, and insights from contemporary understandings of melancholia. The 2006 book by Joshua Wolf Shenk was one of The New York Times’ Notable Books of the Year, and it received the Abraham Lincoln Institute Book Award as well as an award from the National Mental Health Association.  

The Intimate World of Abraham Lincoln, by C. A. Tripp and released in 2005, provides a psychological analysis of Lincoln’s relationships with male colleagues and friends, a broken engagement and questionable love story, and his romantically strained marriage.

The Lincolns: Portrait of a Marriage follows Abe and Mary Todd Lincoln through 22 years of marriage, from their early days in Springfield, IL, to the White House, and their complex, challenging lives together. The 2009 book by Daniel Mark Epstein was the first book to focus on the president, the man, the first lady, and the woman.  

Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

Imaging Illness

The “Saint of Spitalfields,” Rev. Tobias Atwater, is found stabbed to death, his body mutilated and jammed into a sewer pipe, a popped balloon in his waistcoat pocket.

Days later Sir Maxwell Ball, chairman of the East London Waterworks Co., is found stabbed to death in an iron “slipper bath” tub in the Whitechapel Bathhouse, a popped balloon in his waistcoat pocket.

These are the first of a series of murder victims who were associated with London’s cholera epidemic in 1849: Some of them mishandled the spread of disease by releasing unfiltered water into the drinking water supply; others preyed upon the poor whose families were dislocated because of the epidemic.

It is November, 1866, nearly 20 years after the worst outbreak of cholera in London history that took more than 14,000 lives. The Inspector of Nuisances rushes feverish parents to what’s known as the fever hospital, sends children to the Whitechapel Workhouse where they pick oakum for long hours during the day and suffer under the hands of abusers at night.

This is the setting for Murder by Lamplight, the 2024 murder mystery by Patrice McDonough that dramatizes London’s delayed response to cholera and public health officials’ reluctance to acknowledge the source of the epidemic, persisting in the belief that the disease spread through the air despite carefully gathered evidence that traced the path of infection via the water supply.

https://www.amazon.com/Murder-Lamplight-Patrice-McDonough-ebook/dp/B0C6FW2HCM

 For this author’s review, see: https://historicalnovelsociety.org/reviews/murder-by-lamplight-a-dr-julia-lewis-mystery/

 The novel refers to the work of Dr. John Snow, who created a mortality map or what was known at the time as The Ghost Map in 1854. The map was one of the first, if not the first, scientific image to demonstrate how contagion spreads. It makes use of the principles of epidemiology that as recently as the Covid-19 pandemic of 2020 have been used to survey communities where disease occurs, identify vulnerable areas and populations, and begin to understand how disease spreads and what may be done to slow it down.

 Ghost Mapper

https://www.londonremembers.com/subjects/dr-john-snow

Dr. John Snow first became aware of cholera when he was a physician-in-training and was sent to treat miners who were dying of the disease in Killingworth, northern England. At the time, he noted the link between unsanitary conditions and disease, telling his family that the mine “was one huge privy,” and he suspected the cause of the epidemic could be found in food or water. Cholera resided in and affected the digestive system, and as Snow observed in Killingworth, miners “always take their victuals with unwashed hands.”  (Marilee Peters: Patient Zero)

After finishing his medical training, Snow established a medical practice in London where he specialized in anesthesiology, experimenting with various doses of ether and chloroform on animals as well as himself in his home. (Ghost Map)

Snow began focusing on cholera and its mechanism of transmission in 1848 when he learned of a peculiarity—two men had died from the disease within days of one another after spending the night in the same room of a lodging house. The disease then spread throughout the nearby area over the following week. Snow discounted the miasma theory of cholera transmission that was prevalent at the time—ie, the disease spread through the air—when he learned the same doctor had treated both men in the same room in the lodging house and breathed the same air but never contracted the disease. (Ghost Map)

After consulting with chemists and water and sewer authorities, Snow theorized that cholera was caused by ingesting water or material that had been contaminated by people who had already been infected, and he started gathering evidence to support the theory. He studied the water supply in London’s districts and learned that residents were less likely to die from cholera if their water came from a particular area of the Thames--upstream from where sewage routinely drained into the river. People of northern London got their water from various sources, including rivers other than the Thames. People living in southern London who were more at risk for cholera got their water downstream from the area of the Thames where the city’s sewers discharged their waste. (Ghost Map)

Snow tested his theory by surveying people in their homes, asking who and how many people had been affected by the disease, how many had died, and where they got their drinking water. He soon found irregularities in the water supply system: Though buildings were close by one another, they did not receive water from the same source. One tenement received water from one of the city’s two private water supply companies, while neighboring buildings got water from the other company.

An outbreak of cholera along Broad Street in Soho gave him a unique opportunity—he could take water samples from all the local pumps and try to track patterns of disease contamination.

 The Broad Street Epidemic

The first case of cholera along Broad Street was detected on August 31, 1854. By September 10, 500 people were dead from the disease.

Snow walked up and down the streets in the neighborhood and interviewed residents to learn who had contracted the disease and document where they lived and the source of their water. He encountered oddities: None of the workers at the Broad Street Brewery died or even was affected by the disease, but none of the workers drank water from nearby pumps either. They were given rations of beer, and the water used in the brewing process was boiled before entering the tanks.  https://www.history.co.uk/articles/1854-broad-street-cholera-outbreak

Likewise, only a few people living in St. James Workhouse, a charity home with more than 500 men, women, and children located around the corner from Broad Street, contracted the disease while hundreds of their neighbors living only a few doors away succumbed. (Patient Zero)

Snow suspected that cholera was being spread via the Broad Street pump but was stymied by one fact: An elderly woman who lived across town and nowhere near the Broad Street pump had died in the epidemic on September 2. Through his interviews, Snow learned that the woman’s sons worked in a percussion cap factory on Broad Street and sent a jug of water drawn from the Broad Street pump to their mother every day because she believed the water tasted better. (Patient Zero)

With these anomalies aside, Snow was able to show that the source of the disease and the epidemic was the Broad Street water pump. The results of his investigations? A map.

The Map

A map of mortality, or what’s known as the Ghost Map, was prepared by Dr. John Snow in the summer of 1854. On a cross section of city streets, Snow marked every case of cholera that had been reported at each address. He then flagged the locations of water pumps in and around Broad Street. The result was clear: Black bars marking every cholera-related death radiated out from the Broad Street pump. The density of the markings was thickest at locations closest to the pump, and it lessened at locations farther away. (Patient Zero)

https://www.slideserve.com/thais/gen-101-public-health-powerpoint-ppt-presentation

Though somewhat skeptical of Snow’s findings, the Board of Governors of the parish overseeing Broad Street voted on September 8 to remove the handle to the pump that supplied water to residents, and the trajectory of the disease turned. Deaths from cholera continued in the area for several more days, but they then declined significantly, and no new cases of the disease were reported. (The Ghost Map)

Mapping Disease Today

Much like John Snow, epidemiologists create maps of disease outbreaks to identify their source and plot their paths. The Covid-19 pandemic was traced to Wuhan, China, at the end of 2019, and its course was illustrated in maps across the globe and in the US.

Present-day maps depend on data similar to that collected by Snow—reports of particular symptom clusters and deaths related to them as well as where they are occurring—and are gathered by means of sophisticated local, regional, and national public health surveillance systems. They also rely on statistical modeling of data that identifies which individuals in the population are susceptible or more likely than others to contract the disease, which are infectious and capable of spreading the disease, and which at one time had the disease but are now no longer infected. (https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2021.0014)

 Scientific techniques for tracking disease have been fine-tuned during the Covid pandemic. Among them are geospatial analysis, which tracks the spread of disease over a geographical area over the course of time; data mining, which dives into geographical information systems and finds patterns of disease spread among interstate travelers and mobile device users; web-based mapping, which disseminates information about disease spread for Internet users. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7832930/

The objective of today’s disease imaging technologies is the same as John Snow’s: step-by-step accumulation of information from infected individuals about where and how they may have acquired the disease to find the means of transmission, identify and eliminate the source, and take steps to stop the spread.  

 Sources:

Steven Johnson: The Ghost Map, Riverhead Books, 2006.

Marilee Peters: Patient Zero, Annick Press Ltd., 2021.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7832930/

https://www.history.co.uk/articles/1854-broad-street-cholera-outbreak

https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2021.0014  


Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

Evolving History

Chicago’s Goodman Theatre in October restaged the 1955 play Inherit the Wind, taking theatergoers back to 1925 when the state of Tennessee prosecuted teacher John Scopes for violating the recently passed Butler Law prohibiting anyone from teaching “any theory that denies the Story of the Divine Creation of Man as taught in the Bible and to teach instead that man had descended from a lower order of animals.”

After Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species was published in 1859, schools in the US soon began teaching the theory of evolution. (Edward J. Larson: Trial and Error)

In the 1920s, however, state legislatures tried to prohibit the practice:

In 1921 and -22 Kentucky and South Carolina’s efforts were defeated.

In 1923, schools in Oklahoma were prevented from purchasing textbooks that published information about and teachers from teaching evolution.

In 1924, the governor of North Carolina dropped two textbooks from public schools’ curricula so students wouldn’t see “a picture of a monkey and a man on the same page.” (Trial and Error, p 61)

In 1925 the Tennessee legislature passed its prohibition nearly unanimously—71 to 5 in the state house and 24-6 in the state senate—and other states followed the same path: Texas, Mississippi, and Arkansas. (Trial and Error)

The US Supreme Court in 1968 ruled unanimously that an Arkansas law outlawing the teaching of evolution violated the First Amendment of the Constitution separating church and state. https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/epperson-v-arkansas/

Nevertheless, more than 50 years later, teaching about the theory of evolution is still being challenged. A US District Court in August of this year dismissed an Indiana lawsuit alleging that the teaching of evolution violated the state constitution (National Center for Science Education). And while the theory is taught in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, it must be accompanied by the teaching of creationism in 17 states. (https://nesc.ngo)

Attitudes about evolution are, dare I say, evolving. A three-decade longitudinal study shows GenXers’ acceptance of the theory increases with age. Between 38 and 44 percent of the 5000 GenXers in the study accepted the theory when they were in high school compared to between 54 and 57 percent today. And their uncertainty declines over time: 37 percent were unsure about the theory in high school; only 11 to 13 percent are today. (https://eeb.msu.edu/news/awesome-or-bogus-gen-x-attitudes-toward-evolution.aspx

The theory of evolution itself is evolving. Scientists are documenting how humans continue to evolve as a result of changes in medicine, agriculture, and culture.  (Conor Feehly: How Are Human Still Evolving, Discover magazine)

Where Language Came From

One area of particular interest is the evolution of language. Steven Mithen, a prehistory professor at the University of Reading, explores The Language Puzzle by tracing developments across time in anthropology, archaeology, genetics, linguistics, and psychology. He compares and contrasts language among the closest living relatives to man—chimpanzees—noting that chimps make sounds that are similar to words but they do not form actual speech because of anatomical and cognitive limitations. (Steven Mithen: The Language Puzzle, Basic Books, 2024)

The Language Puzzle: Piecing Together the Six-Million-Year Story of How Words Evolved: Mithen, Steven: 9781541605381: Amazon.com: Books

One of the first scientists to try to unravel the language puzzle was the naturalist Richard L. Garner.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lynch_Garner

As a child growing up in Appalachia, Lynch first came up with the idea that animals talk. “I believed that all animals of the same kind could understand each other, and I recall many instances in which they really did so.” Yet his elders denied that animals could actually speak. That led him to investigate the sounds animals make, how these sounds compare or differ from speech, and the overall question: what is speech? (Richard Lynch Garner: Apes and Monkeys. Their Life and Language, 1900).

https://www.amazon.com/Apes-monkeys-Their-life-language/dp/B00085QGBY

 Garner’s book, Apes and Monkeys, published in 1900, challenged the belief at the time that animals did not interact with their environment or communicate with one another by presenting his observations of monkeys and apes in a caged environment as well as the wild, his interactions with monkeys he considered to be friends, and his time in the French Congo where he lived in a six foot-square cage for weeks at a time. He noted how monkeys keep watch and warn one another of possible danger, discriminate between items of food and invariably choose the largest one offered, adjust to games with a set number of marbles and search for missing ones when the total differs from what they’re used to. (https://www.erbzine.com/mag18/garner.htm )

While in the cage he built near Lake Ferman Vax in Gaboon, he watched as a school of monkeys surrounded and inspected the structure, heard the changes in bird calls over the course of the day, worried when a leopard approached after tracking his scent, and woke every morning to the cry of the king gorilla.  

In the preface to the book, author Garner “frankly confesses to his own belief in the psychic unity of all animate nature. Believing in a common source of life, a common law of living, and a common destiny for all creatures, he feels that to dignify the apes is not to degrade man but rather to exalt him.

“Believing that a more perfect knowledge of these animals will bring man into closer fellowship and deeper sympathy with nature, and with an abiding trust that it will widen the bounds of humanity and cause man to realize that he and they are but common links in the one great chain of life, the author gives this work to the world. When once man is impressed with the consciousness that in some degree, however small, all creatures think and feel, it will lessen his vanity and ennoble his heart.”

The fictional memoir Man in a Cage, published in 2020, recaps Garner’s early experiments recording the sounds primates make min the Cincinnati Zoo and his first trip to Africa.

Man in a Cage - Kindle edition by Nevins, Patrick. Literature & Fiction Kindle eBooks @ Amazon.com.

 As written by this author in a review for the Historical Novel Society (see: https://historicalnovelsociety.org/reviews/man-in-a-cage/), “Man in a Cage chronicles Garner’s travels and difficulties gaining support for his work—the promised Edison phonograph that never arrives in Gabon, the sudden loss of funding—as well as the threats and dangers of the jungle from sudden fever and a mysterious attack on the cage: was it done by animals or men?

“Written in a fresh, almost ingenuous manner, the first-person narrative lets readers share Garner’s enthusiasm and breathlessness as he navigates elephant trails and fingers of jungle, discovers subtle animal behaviors… [takes note of] underlying conflicts among tribesmen, traders, and missionaries…and [encounters] uncertainty about the theory of evolution, and outright disparagement among religious groups that classify any thought of the links between man and primates as heresy.”

Evolution on Trial

 The Scopes Monkey Trial, called the Trial of the Century in 1925, is actually only one of five Trials of the Century in the 1920s. The first was the prosecution of the Italian anarchists Sacco and Vanzetti (1920-7), next was the rape conviction involving silent film star Fatty Arbuckle (1921), then the Hall-Mills trial involving an Episcopal priest and a choir member (1922), and the “perfect crime” trial of Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb (1924).

The Scopes trial pitted high-profile personages against one another. For the prosecution: William Jennings Bryan, three-time presidential candidate known for his oratory in support of Evangelicals, farmers, and the downtrodden. For the defense: Clarence Darrow, fresh from his 12-hour summation in the Leopold and Loeb case that exhorted the court to refrain from sentencing the boys to death, nothing that “all life is worth saving, and that mercy is the highest attribute of man.” (Gregg Jarrett: Trial of the Century, p 43)

The defendant John T. Scopes agreed to become involved when local Dayton, Tennessee, businessmen sponsored and the American Civil Liberties Union funded a lawsuit that tested the constitutionality of the Butler Law and incongruously required teachers to use a specific biology textbook but then make it criminal for a teacher to teach from the pages devoted to evolution. (Trial of the Century, p 146)

The trial lasted less than two weeks and had its share of controversies and carnival consequences. The judge would not allow any testimony from experts about the theory of evolution and its grounding in science. The town of Dayton became a sideshow with self-appointed preachers railing against evolution, shops and stalls hawking toy monkey souvenirs, and reporters from more than 100 newspapers wedging themselves among the 1000 people in the gallery. (ACLU: State of Tennessee v. Scopes, July 21, 1925)

Though the jury took only minutes to find Scopes guilty and the judge fined him $100 for teaching that man descended from a lower order of animals, the verdict was reversed on appeal. The Tennessee Supreme Court found that the judge erred in deciding on the amount of the fine; only juries could impose fines of more than $50. But it upheld the constitutionality of the law that stopped teachers from teaching the theory of evolution. (James C. Foster: Scopes Monkey Trial, Free Speech Center, July 2, 2024)

Known for the brisk back-and-forth between Darrow and Bryan, trial testimony was, not surprisingly, dramatized in the 1955 play as well as the 1960 film starring Spencer Tracy and Fredric March. The two men jousted over the meaning of Biblical references to Cain’s wife, the length of a day of creation, the time men have lived on earth, the time the earth was created, and the date of Noah’s flood. Darrow asks Bryan:

“What do you think that the Bible itself says? Don’t you know how it was arrived at?”

“I never made a calculation.”

“A calculation from what?”

“I could not say.”

“What do you think?”

“I do not think about things I don’t think about.”

“Do you think about things you do think about?”

As the Henry Drummond character said in the play and film: “He that troubleth his own house shall inherit the wind.”

 Sources:

Richard Lynch Garner. 1900 Apes and Monkeys. Their Life and Language. Boston/London: Ginn & Company

https://www.erbzine.com/mag18/garner.htm 

https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/epperson-v-arkansas/

https://nesc.ngo

Edward J. Larson: Trial and Error

Conor Feehly: How Are Human Still Evolving, Discover magazine)

Gregg Jarrett: Trial of the Century, p 43

ACLU: State of Tennessee v. Scopes, July 21, 1925

James C. Foster: Scopes Monkey Trial, Free Speech Center, July 2, 2024)

Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

Ship Wrecked—Failed Prosecutions

 The Eastland disaster faded from memory not only because of other, more notable shipwrecks at the time—the sinking of the Titanic and the Lusitania (see the previous Time Stamp post). It also has been largely forgotten because of the delayed and prolonged legal process that never assigned blame or compensated victims’ families.

Investigations after the wrecks of the Titanic and Lusitania were hardly more satisfactory.

https://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/ds.13444/ US Senate inquiry committee convenes.

The US Senate investigation conducted after the sinking of the Titanic ran from April 19 to May 25, 1912, concluding at its end that the British Board of Trade had been lax in regulating steamships overall and hastily inspected the Titanic itself.

The British Board’s own investigation attributed the disaster to the excessive speed of the ship but not the captain who piloted the vessel at those speeds, noting he “was only doing that which other skilled men would have done.” U.S. Senate investigation of the Titanic's sinking

The sinking of the Titanic did result in new safety measures. The first 1913 International Conference for Safety of Life at Sea ruled ships must have enough lifeboat space for every person onboard as well as lifeboat drills. Ironically, the installation of more lifeboats in keeping with the requirement made the Eastland more unstable.  https://www.britannica.com/topic/International-Conference-for-Safety-of-Life-at-Sea

German propaganda postcard of Lusitania. The torpedo is incorrectly depicted as hitting the port side of ship. Next to the Kaiserliche Marine ensign is shown Grand Admiral Tirpitz, major proponent of submarine warfare.

 

The German Government after the loss of the Lusitania claimed the ship had been “armed with guns…and as is well known here, she had large quantities of war material in her cargo.” "Sinking Justified, Says Dr. Dernburg; Lusitania a "War Vessel", Known to be Carrying Contraband, Hence Search Was Not Necessary" (PDF). The New York Times. 9 May 1915. p. 4. 

 While the Lusitania had been fitted with gun mounts during construction (so she could later be converted into a merchant marine cruiser), guns had not been added or armed. One inspector found no guns or mounts onboard before the ship sailed. And the ammunition on board were cartridges for small weapons that were “non-explosive” in nature, even in bulk. "Sinking Justified, Says Dr. Dernburg; Lusitania a "War Vessel", Known to be Carrying Contraband, Hence Search Was Not Necessary" (PDF). The New York Times.

The German government did bar U-boats from the English Channel and the waters along the west coast of the UK until January, 1917, when it removed all restrictions on U-boat routes.

Survivors and their relatives sued the German government after its defeat in WW I and agreed to an arbiter’s decision on compensation. The government was liable for direct personal injuries and property loss on a case-by-case basis. (https://www.rmslusitania.info/primary-docs/mcc/candlish

Eastland Prosecutions

Criminal cases were brought in the state of Illinois and in the federal circuit court, but only one criminal case was ever prosecuted, and it took place in Grand Rapids, Michigan, where the Eastland had been built by the Michigan Steamship Company.

Immediate Criminal Investigation

Less than a week after the sinking, seven inquiries were launched by officials in Chicago and Cook County, including law enforcement—state and district attorneys and the coroner—commerce and public utilities commissions, steamboat and harbor and wharves inspectors and city council committee members.

A Cook County coroner’s jury impaneled the day after the sinking ruled on July 29 that the ship was unseaworthy because it had not been properly constructed, maintained, or operated and that four top officials of the steamship company as well as its captain and chief engineer should be brought before a Cook County criminal grand jury.

The Cook County grand jury did indict company officials. The jury held that the officers of the firm knew the ship was unstable and still allowed 2500 passengers to board, were negligent in hiring an incompetent engineer, did not have a sufficient number of sailors on board to help in the event of an accident, and failed to properly maintain ballast tanks. The jury also charged the ship’s captain, Harry Pedersen, and chief engineer, Joseph Erickson, with criminal carelessness and negligence.

Further prosecution in the state of Illinois stalled, however, while federal steamboat and marine inspectors participated in a formal board of inquiry. A federal grand jury in September handed down nearly 20 indictments of top members of the steamship company, the ship’s engineer and captain, and the Indiana Transportation Company for criminal carelessness and conspiracy to defraud the federal government by interfering with maritime law. Warrants were issued on September 29 for six of eight of the men who had been indicted federally and for only one of the three original charges—conspiracy to operate an unsafe ship.

The Federal Case

The principal allegation made by the prosecution revolved around the seaworthiness of the Eastland. US District Attorney Charles Clyne argued that the ship was top-heavy and likely to list or capsize if passengers moved or the sea or wind changed suddenly yet the officers of the company conspired to allow it to sail and the captain and chief engineer were not competent enough to sail her. (Hilton: Eastland Legacy of the Titanic)

The defense attorney for Capt. Pedersen pushed for dismissal of the case because of an overall lack of evidence of an actual crime. The attorney for engineer Joseph Erickson discounted the prosecution’s claims of unseaworthiness and incompetence and pointed to an unusual cause of the accident: Clarence Darrow argued that the ship foundered and capsized because it had been resting on a hidden underwater obstruction, such as pilings and bricks and concrete that remained after the collapse of a nearby building years before. However, the ability of a freighter to anchor at the same spot along the Chicago River wharf with no difficulty later refuted that argument. (Hilton: Eastland Legacy of the Titanic)

The presiding judge decided the defendants were not guilty on February 18, 1916, because there was no evidence of conspiracy—defendants were not colluding to cover up knowledge about the seaworthiness of the vessel. He did not rule, however, on whether the ship was seaworthy in the first place or whether an underwater obstruction played a part. (Hilton: Eastland Legacy of the Titanic)

Also unresolved were indictments brought against the captain and engineer in the state of Illinois. The indictments were held in abeyance while the federal case was prosecuted and never were reinstated afterward. (Hilton: Eastland Legacy of the Titanic)

Civil Cases

Civil lawsuits brought on behalf of the victims and their families took 24 years to wend their way through the judicial system, and in the end plaintiffs received little or nothing. Precedence was given to claims filed on behalf of the salvage company that had towed the vessel away from the accident site and the coal company that supplied fuel. https://eastlanddisaster.org/

The Trial That Never Was

On the 100th anniversary of the Eastland disaster, a mock criminal trial was sponsored by the Eastland Disaster Organization. Leaders of the legal community, including Judge Anne Burke and high-profile attorney Dan Webb (defense attorney for Fox news in the Dominion voting systems defamation case) participated in the trial at the Harold Washington Library in downtown Chicago.

Three men were charged with involuntary manslaughter: the president, vice-president, secretary, and treasurer of the steamship company, and the facts from 1915 were viewed through the prism of 2015 law. https://www.chicagolawbulletin.com/archives/2015/06/19/eastland-disaster-06-19-15

The prosecutor argued that the defendants were negligent because they had not tested the ship after lifeboats had been added in response to the sinking of the Titanic and pointed to a letter written in 1913 by a naval architect that warned the Eastland was at risk of a “serious accident.”

Defense attorney Webb called the letter hearsay and based his defense on the fact that the US government itself had considered the ship to be seaworthy and safe.

Five of six members of the audience who served as jurors in the mock trial voted not guilty. The majority of the audience at large voted not guilty (58 percent), a few voted guilty (29 percent) and 13 percent believed some but not all of the defendants should have been found guilty.

https://www.chicagolawbulletin.com/archives/2015/06/19/eastland-disaster-06-19-15

 Fate of the Eastland

The ship was raised from the Chicago River in August, 1915. Two years later it was sold to the US Navy, converted into a gunboat, and took the name USS Wilmette. It did not engage in combat during WW I and was later used as a navy training vessel. It was decommissioned in 1945 and sold for scrap in 1946. The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

 Sources

^ "Sinking Justified, Says Dr. Dernburg; Lusitania a "War Vessel", Known to be Carrying Contraband, Hence Search Was Not Necessary" (PDF). The New York Times. 9 May 1915. p. 4. Justification of the sinking of the liner Lusitania by German submarines as a man of war was advanced today by Dr. Bernhard Dernburg, former German Colonial Secretary and regarded as the Kaiser's official mouthpiece in the United States. Dr. Dernburg gave out a statement at the Hollenden Hotel following his arrival in Cleveland to address the City Club at noon on Germany's attitude in the present war

^ Halsey, Francis Whiting (1919). The Literary Digest History of the World War. Funk & Wagnalls. p. 255.

George W. Hilton: Eastland Legacy of the Titanic, Stanford University Press, 1995.

 https://www.chicagolawbulletin.com/archives/2015/06/19/eastland-disaster-06-19-15

 . The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

. https://eastlanddisaster.org/

(https://www.rmslusitania.info/primary-docs/mcc/candlish

U.S. Senate investigation of the Titanic's sinking

  https://www.britannica.com/topic/International-Conference-for-Safety-of-Life-at-Sea

 

Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

Ship Wreck

A young woman travels from the nearby suburb of Cicero to the Clark Street Bridge which spans the Chicago River. She unwraps a water-soaked cloth and removes the rose she clipped from one of her rose bushes, caresses the petals, then drops the blossom into the cold, dark water. It is July, 1944, 29 years after her sister and hundreds of others drowned when the ferryboat Eastland capsized. Her story is told in The Rose Keeper, a 2021 historical novel.

https://www.amazon.com/Rose-Keeper-Jennifer-Lamont-Leo/dp/1733705872

For this author’s review, see: https://historicalnovelsociety.org/reviews/the-rose-keeper/

 At 11:45 on July 24, 2024, descendants of the passengers who died on the Eastland gathered along Riverwalk at the corner of Clark Street and Wacker Drive under the Clark Street Bridge for a moment of silence and a ceremony on the 109th anniversary of the tragedy. The ceremony was led by the Eastland Historical Society, founded in 1998 by families of the survivors to create a lasting legacy for those affected by the tragedy—victims, heroes, and survivors. https://eastlanddisaster.org/

The sinking of the Eastland is considered the worst disaster in the history of the city of Chicago and the history of seafaring on the Great Lakes. A total of 844 people lost their lives, more than the 606 who perished in the Iroquois Theatre fire in 1903 and the 300 to 400 who died during the great Chicago Fire in 1871. (George W. Hilton: Eastland: Legacy of the Titanic)

The tragedy killed more passengers than the sinking of the Titanic or the Lusitania. Of a total of 1523 lives were lost when the Titanic struck an iceberg and sank on April, 1912, 829 were passengers. Seven-hundred-eight-five of those who died when the Lusitania was torpedoed and sunk on May 7, 1915, were passengers. Nearly all—841--of the people who died when the Eastland steamer sank on the Chicago River were passengers. (Legacy of the Titanic)

 State and federal criminal trials seeking to assign blame and recover damages drew in famous names: Clarence Darrow, defence attorney in the landmark Scopes monkey trial as well as the prosecution of the notorious murder-for-sport trial of Leopold and Loeb, defended the Eastland’s chief engineer Joseph Erickson, and Judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis, later commissioner of baseball, presided. 

 Yet the wreck of the Eastland has largely faded from memory, perhaps not surprisingly since two others events occurring at roughly the same time command attention—the sinking of the Titanic and the loss of the Lusitania.

 Titanic and Lusitania

 Both the Titanic and Lusitania were prestige ocean-going vessels that attracted and catered to the wealthy. On board Titanic were American millionaires Benjamin Guggenheim and John Jacob Aster as well as railroad magnate Charles M. Hays. Traveling on the Lusitania were less familiar but no less prominent names—Arthur Henry Adams, president of U. S. Rubber Co., and Anne Shymer, president of U. S. Chemical Co.

And both vessels had high profiles.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/gabrielsanchez/haunting-pictures-from-the-titanic-before-she-sank

The loss of the Titanic was, of course, ironic because it had been called unsinkable. Shipbuilders decried the claim that the company had advertised the ship as unsinkable, blaming the “unsinkable” label on news articles that concluded the ship’s system of watertight compartments and electronically operated doors made the ship “practically unsinkable.” https://www.historyonthenet.com/the-titanic-why-did-people-believe-titanic-was-unsinkable

 A publicity brochure produced by the White Star shipping line praised Titanic and sister ship Olympia as “vessels designed to be unsinkable.” The company insisted the ships had been designed to be unsinkable, not that they were. When first informed that the Titanic was in peril, a vice president from the company nevertheless was confident the ship would stay afloat, saying at the time: “We believe the ship is unsinkable.” (The ship sank in little more than two hours.) https://www.historyonthenet.com/the-titanic-why-did-people-believe-titanic-was-unsinkable

The attack on the Lusitania should not have come as a surprise. WW I had been raging across Europe since July, 1914, and German U-boats had been operating in the waters off England since August of that year.

 Shipping lines had even been warned. On the day before the ship set sail from New York, the German embassy posted in newspapers: “vessels flying the flag of Great Britain, or of any of her allies, are liable to destruction.” Lusitania nevertheless was considered to be too fast to be targeted by a U-boat commander and safe because it did not carry cargo but was a passenger liner. (It sank in 18 minutes.) https://www.thestar.com/news/insight/germany-gave-a-warning-so-why-was-lusitania-full/article_e8bc224e-d099-5b86-8894-ffb3ce2cb19b.html

https://industrialscenery.blogspot.com/2016/06/ss-eastland.html

By contrast, Eastland was a modest steamboat that provided round-trip service across Lake Michigan covering a 77-mile route between the ports of Chicago and South Haven, Michigan. It had its own claim to fame: it was known as the Speed Queen of the Great Lakes.

 None of its passengers was famous or rich, however; every one of them worked for or was related to a worker for Western Electric Manufacturing, every one of them was on board for the trip across Lake Michigan to the company’s annual picnic in Michigan City, Indiana.

 The ship also was considered to be safe. After all, ships had learned a lesson from Titanic—make sure there are enough life boats to accommodate the passenger load. But the added weight of the life boats made Eastland unstable. (It slipped over on its side trapping hundreds of passengers below deck in an hour.)

  Sinking

 George W. Hilton, author of Eastland: Legacy of the Titanic, provides a minute-by-minute account.

https://www.amazon.com/s?k=eastland+legacy+of+the+titanic&adgrpid=1343604908220444&hvadid=83975584137599&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&hvlocphy=48792&hvnetw=o&hvqmt=e&hvtargid=kwd-83976348460121%3Aloc-190&hydadcr=20614_13322592&msclkid=b3118763e9a717211353e1c075b04446&tag=mh0b-20&ref=pd_sl_5sdxwlppdh_e

 Among them:

 6:00--passengers being loading, then within six to ten minutes, the ship lists 10 degrees starboard.

6:48—the ship steadies as water is sent to ballast tanks.

6:51—the ship is at even keel.

7:16—the ship lists 10-15 degrees.

7:20—the ship lists to port taking water on the deck.

7:23—the list is so severe, passengers are ordered to move to the starboard side.

7:25—the list eases but resumes two minutes later.

7:28—the ship is listing at 45 degrees and below decks, dishes fall off shelves, a piano and refrigerator slide across the floor, trapping two women underneath.

7:30—the ship settles, its bow is in 20 feet of water, the stern is 37 feet above the water, the hurricane deck is 24 feet below the water line.

 Rescue

 The first alarm call was sent just as the Eastland was settling, getting police call boats and the Coast Guard alongside the ship within ten minutes. From the streets along the river, sellers in produce and poultry markets threw wooden cases and crates, chicken coops and egg crates into the water so flailing passengers could grab hold of something and keep afloat.

 Nearby boats cast off lifeboats and lifelines, some vessels getting close enough for people on deck to climb onboard, and volunteers dove into the river and pulled people to safety. Some rescue efforts were delayed, however, because of fears that the ship’s boiler would explode. For that reason, a fireboat did not approach for more than ten minutes, and police did not climb onto the deck for about 30 minutes.  

Bodies continued to be pulled from the wreckage for days, and the dead were laid out in the make-shift morgue at the Second Regiment Armory until the bodies could be identified. The last victim, a seven-year-old boy was identified on July 30. Bearing the tag 396 and a name given by police and morgue attendants—“Little Feller”—the boy was identified by a next door neighbour, another seven-year-old who had just recently attended the boy’s birthday party. Little Feller was Willie Novotny. He and the rest of his immediate family—father, mother, and sister—died on the Eastland.  (Jay Bonansinga: The Sinking of the Eastland)

  

One of the deadliest shipwrecks in American history, the Eastland still is largely forgotten; according to some historians it’s because the ship capsized in only 20 feet of water. According to others, it’s been ignored because, unlike the Titanic and Lusitania, the dead were not among the wealthy class. Still others point to the lengthy legal battles that led to civil and criminal prosecutions that took years to decide in courts miles away from Chicago. (See the next Time Stamp.)

 Sources

Jay Bonansiga: The Sinking of the Eastland, Citadel Press, 2004.

George W. Hilton: Eastland: Legacy of the Titanic, Stanford University Press, 1995.

https://eastlanddisaster.org/

https://www.historyonthenet.com/the-titanic-why-did-people-believe-titanic-was-unsinkable

https://www.thestar.com/news/insight/germany-gave-a-warning-so-why-was-lusitania-full/article_e8bc224e-d099-5b86-8894-ffb3ce2cb19b.html  

Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

Dust Thou Art

The days before one of the worst black blizzards to barrel across the Plains, an event song writer Woody Guthrie “watched…come up like the Red Sea closin’ in on the Israel children,” lead up to April 14, 1935, Black Sunday, the title and subject of Chicago-based TimeLine Theatre Company’s final production for the 2023-4 season. (https://www.themorgan.org/exhibitions/online/guthrie/black-sunday,)

As middle-aged Okie mother Ma is increasingly overcome by a compulsion to sketch the visions she sees in her dreams—menacing swirls of black and gray blotting out sky and land--TimeLine’s 27th theatrical production illuminates the challenges of the Depression-era Oklahoma panhandle through its characters:

Stubborn Pa, unwilling to give up on his land and homestead despite years of drought, locust and wild rabbit infestations.

Daughter Sunny, searching for a way out of the daily grind like thousands of other families who pack up wagons and head west to California.

Mexican laborer Jesús, an itinerant farmworker forced to move from homestead to homestead, harvest to harvest in literally back-breaking labor using the short handle hoe known as el cortito or el brazo del diablo (the devil’s arm) that requires him to stoop over as he thins and weeds crops for more than 12 hours a day. (https://timelinetheatre.com/events/black-sunday/

The 2018 novel Death of a Rainmaker sets a murder and its investigation against the backdrop of a 240-day drought that brings flamboyant Roland Coombs to Jackson, Oklahoma, on August 2, 1935.  Roland promises residents he will bring rain to parched fields with “a little old matchstick and a load of TNT.” Instead, Roland is found dead the next afternoon, bludgeoned to death and hidden beneath mounds of dirt and sand left after an hour-long duster pummeled the walls of the city’s Jewel Movie House.

Like Black Sunday, Death of a Rainmaker recalls the devastating, decades-long effects of environmental abuse across the Dust Bowl. It also factors in efforts to address the long-term droughts and their consequences, including the environmental restoration work of the New Deal’s Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) and the charlatans who guarantee they will “give the skies a healthy kick in the drawers” to bring down rain.

The Dust Bowl

During the 1930s and early 1940s, waves of drought regularly passed over the Great Plains of the Southwest. Overall, precipitation was 15-20% less than normal almost every year of the decade, and in some years, it was more than 50% less than normal. Some areas had less than 10 inches per year for several years in a row. (https://www.weather.gov/ama/dust_bowl_versus_today) With little surface water or timber to serve as anchors, the Plains was also subject to high winds.

Nevertheless, the area became the target of agricultural development in the late 1800s. The Homestead Act, passed in 1862, gave individuals 160 acres of land to settle and “improve.” The Kirkland Act of 1904 and the Enlarged Homestead Act of 1909 encouraged even more settlement, leading to property claims that encompassed 270 million acres or 10% of the continental US. (https://timelinetheatre.com/events/black-sunday/

 To transform natural prairies into tillable acres, the new and inexperienced farmers pulled up grasses, in the process exposing and loosening soil by removing the roots that held the soil in place and trapped meager amounts of rainfall. Cattle and sheep on ranches also pulled up the natural grasses and shrubs that held onto soil, and over-farming depleted and dried it out.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sunday_(storm)#:~:text=On%20the%2014th%20day%20of,that%20ever%20filled%20the%20sky

 Black Blizzards

Dust storms increased in number and intensified as soil conditions worsened. The yearly number of storms nearly tripled in one year, rising from 14 in 1932 to 38 in 1933. A storm on May 11, 1934 sent clouds of dust 2 miles high across the country, traveling over 2000 miles to dust buildings along the East Coast. https://footnote.wordpress.ncsu.edu/2020/07/23/black-blizzards-7-24-2020/

Along with high winds and dust, the Dust Bowl area was infested by insects and overrun by rabbits. A swarm of grasshoppers on July 26, 1931 was so thick it blocked out the sun, leaving mounds of carapaces that had to be removed with scoops and cornstalks that had been eaten to the ground. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/grasshoppers-bring-ruin-to-midwest

Black-tailed rabbits multiplied steadily, reaching a total population of nearly 8 million in 30 Kansas counties in 1935 and devouring not only corn stalks but their roots as well. https://www.kshs.org/kansapedia/jackrabbit-drives/12097

Black Sunday

On the morning of April 14, 1935, a cold front from Canada collided with the warm air mass over the Dakotas, dropping the temperature 30 degrees and kicking up winds from 40 to 60 mph. The storm spanned 1000 miles and moved swiftly across the Plains, hitting northwest Oklahoma at 4:00 pm and Amarillo at 7:00 pm, with winds finally dying down at 7:30 pm. People huddled in their homes or cars while the storm lasted, kerchiefs over their faces.

While none of the people in the area died directly during or immediately after the storm, most had long-term effects from inhaling dust—bronchitis, dust pneumonia or “brown plague” and shortness of breath. Wildlife did not fare as well. Birds tried to fly away from the storm but ended up falling from the sky, and jack rabbits suffocated to death.

Dust Busters

A New Deal program aimed at helping reduce the high rate of unemployment during the Great Depression by employing cadres of workers to conserve natural resources. One of its divisions—the Soil Conservation Service—worked directly with Dust Bowl farmers to ameliorate soil erosion and prevent the devastating consequences of the black blizzards.

Meanwhile, conmen roamed the prairies, advertising their own special techniques for making rain and bilking desperate farmers and townspeople in the process.

 Civilian Conservation Corps

To help reduce overall unemployment stemming from the stock market crash of 1929 and resulting Great Depression, US President Franklin Roosevelt on April 5, 1933, brought together the departments of War, Interior, Agriculture, and Labor to develop a program that would hire and pay young men to work on environmental conservation. In three months, the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) created 1433 camps to accommodate 300,000 men. Two months later, CCC had 2900 camps and 500,000 CCCers. Between the years 1933 and 1942 when the corps was closed, the program employed 3 million men.

CCCers were generally between the ages of 18 and 25 years. They also included veterans of WW I, Native Americans, and craftsmen and skilled foresters as well as African Americans who served for at least six months in a CCC camp that followed military-style operation and rules.

CCC has been credited with replacing 3.5 million trees that were lost because of natural erosion, inappropriate farming practices, fires, and lumbering, accounting for half of all reforestation in the country’s history. (https://www.history.com/topics/great-depression/civilian-conservation-corps)

 The Soil Conservation Service of the Department of Agriculture was formed in 1938 to oversee the work of 60,000 young men each year in 500 projects across 44 states. The men taught farmers how to conserve soil, worked with individual farmers on their own land, tested and researched techniques to control soil erosion. Among them were gullies to capture rainfall, fencing, trees planted on contours of land, and land terraces that prevented water runoff. https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/ccc/salmond/chap7.htm

 Rainmakers

Real-life rainmaking conmen were fodder for almost mythical tales. Tex Thornton, known for arming torpedoes of explosives into hard rock to make way for oil wells, had plans for Dalhart, Texas, in 1935. He released balloons armed with nitroglycerine and time clocks set to explode at various altitudes. Winds carried the balloons away, however, with one dropping onto the roof and detonating a barn and another just missing a family driving east in their car. He left town with only the $300 town leaders paid in front money but did claim credit for the light dusting of snow that fell over the town a week a week later. https://www.oilystuff.com/single-post/rainmaker

Charley Hatfield in the late 1800s was a student of meteorological pluvicultre or rainmaking,

convincing towns desperate for rain that he could induce showers by building towers and blasting his own brand of rain-making substances into the air with dynamite and nitroglycerine.

In 1915 he had a special plan for San Diego. He wouldn’t charge for the first 30 or 40 inches of rain he caused to fall, but he expected $500-$1000 for every inch over and above 30 to 50.

His plan worked way too well. After his rainmaking on January 1, rain fell steadily between the 15th and the 20th. It rained again from the 22nd to the 27th, overflowing the reservoir, washing out bridges, toppling phone lines, flooding streets and eventually causing the dam to burst and washing away 20 people.

When San Diego city leaders refused to pay him, Hatfield threatened to sue. He reneged when he realized he would have to compensate the city for damages. Hatfield the Rainmaker, The Worst Hard Time]

Dust Thou Shalt Return?

Regular irrigation and improvements in agriculture and soil management, such as no-till farming, sustain land and vegetation during dry periods, protect exposed areas, and prevent the erosion of topsoil. But many sources of water are drying up. The Ogallala Aquifer, which irrigates 30-46% of farmland in the Plains states, could be depleted by as much as 70% within 50 years. In the mid-2000s, water levels were already half of what they were 100 years before. https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/dust-bowl-heat-wave-climate-change-twice-as-likely-study-says/

 Higher temperatures and protracted heat waves are up to 2.5 times more likely because of climate change. And the rising temperatures trigger a vicious cycle: High temperatures dry out the land. Drier land releases more energy, and the energy converts to heat. Periods of drought therefore fuel more severe heat waves, which lead to drier conditions. https://e360.yale.edu/features/as-the-climate-warms-could-the-u.s.-face-another-dust-bowl 

The Dust Bowl of the 1930s, and a day like Black Sunday, could very well come again.  

Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

Shell Shock Recognition and Treatment

Though war trauma was described as long ago as 490 BC and has taken many names—battle fatigue in the 1940s, gross stress reaction in the 1950s, post-traumatic stress disorder since the 1980s—shell shock is inextricably linked to WW I, and not only because the term was first used in 1915 by psychologist Charles Myers. The condition has been indelibly experienced in novels about WWI—Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway, William Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying, Pat Barker’s Regeneration series, Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man, Dalton Trumbo’s Johnny Got His Gun, Ernest Hemingway’s A Farewell to Arms, and more recently Steve Stahl’s Shell Shock and Ben Elton’s The First Casualty.

 Shell shock is also a metaphor for the Great War, its apparent pointlessness, months-long stalemates trapping men in mud- and rat-filled trenches under barrages of exploding shells and clouds of poisonous gas while political leaders and military commanders ignored mounting casualties and rejected peace proposals for fear of losing strategic advantage. (Fiona Reid, Broken Men, David Stevenson, Cataclysm)

 Clinical terms for unexplained disorders among fighting men likewise have a long, pre-WW I history: disordered action of the heart (DAH) or palpitations were described during the Crimean War and irritable heart during the Civil War. The entity known as shell shock resides within WW I, coined by the men on the battlefield who saw or felt it themselves. (https://www.apa.org/monitor/2012/06/shell-shocked)

https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/war_psychiatry

The Mystery

Shell shock was a puzzle. There was no single set of characteristic symptoms but a range of unexplained disabilities and sometimes contrasting symptoms: long-term bouts of insomnia and nightmares, generalized fatigue and jumpiness; pain in the chest as well as joints and muscles and cardiac palpitations; loss of function of an arm or leg, loss of voice, hearing, or other sensations. (Edgar Jones and Simon Wessely, Shell Shock to PTSD)

There was no apparent direct cause. An early theory linked symptoms with damage to the brain, hypothesizing that forces from a nearby explosion caused hemorrhages in the blood vessels of the brain and the release of carbon monoxide poisoned brain tissue. But many of the shell-shocked had never been close to an explosion, and some had not even seen combat.  (Shell Shock to PTSD, p 23)

There also was suspicion. Some military leaders worried that the condition was used as an excuse by malingerers or cowards or caused by ingesting cordite or other drugs to quicken heart function and thereby avoid combat. (Shell Shock to PTSD)

The objectives of treatment conflicted as well. While some physicians sought to find a solution that would successfully treat shell shock, military leaders wanted quick action that would make soldiers well enough to return to the battlefield.

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/instant-articles/somme-offensive.html

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/instant-articles/madness-of-war-somme-offensive.html/amp?prebid_ab=enabled

Physical Treatment

As increasing numbers of infantrymen were felled by unusual symptoms, the British Expeditionary Force assigned Charles S. Myers, a medically trained psychologist, to study and try to decipher the cause of the unexplained phenomenon. His first cases exhibited similar symptoms—loss of the senses of sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell as well as tremors, headaches, fatigue, and loss of balance. While the first three men had been near or affected by exploding shells, most later diagnosed as shell-shocked developed symptoms even if they were some distance away from explosions. ( https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-shock-of-war-55376701/#:~:text=The%20official%20Report%20of%20the,of%20concussion%20shock%2C%20following%20a)

Myers and his associate William MacDougal concluded that the condition was the result of repressed trauma, the body’s and mind’s efforts to manage the traumatic experience by repressing its memory and the resulting physical manifestations of the struggle to keep hiding that memory. (https://www.apa.org/monitor/2012/06/shell-shocked

Myers’ plan for treatment built on that conclusion: “Myers and McDougall believed a patient could only be cured if his memory were revived and integrated within his consciousness, a process that might require a number of sessions.”  Treatment therefore should be prompt, in a suitable environment, and psychotherapeutic. “Myers argued that the military should set up specialist units ‘as remote from the sounds of warfare as is compatible with the preservation of the ‘atmosphere' of the front.’ Myers and McDougall believed a patient could only be cured if his memory were revived and integrated within his consciousness, a process that might require a number of sessions.” (https://www.apa.org/monitor/2012/06/shell-shocked)

Not all forward units followed this treatment strategy, however.  Several of the forward units, known as NYDN (not yet diagnosed nervous), relied on a regimen of rest, graduated exercises, route marches, with or without vigorous massage in an environment of respite and reassurance. American forward units added occupational therapy involving farming, road construction, and wood working and art therapy. (Shell Shock and PTSD)  

Discipline also played a role. Both inside the military and outside in the overall British culture, “weak nerves” were shameful, especially during wartime, and the result of an individual’s lack of self-control and will power or outright fraud. The remedy? A personal commitment to recovery and the development of “nervous strength.” (Broken Men)  

Faradism or electric shock therapy was one way to strengthen a weak will. Lewis Yealland, a Canadian neurologist, claimed to have removed the “hysterical disorders of warfare” by applying an electrical current to parts of the body. In his treatments at National Hospital for Paralysed and Epileptic, London, Yealland “bathed” patients in electricity by placing them on a wooden stool that was set on a platform with glass legs and charging them with static electricity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_bath_(electrotherapy), using clamps or machines to mechanically force frozen limbs out of their static position, and apply other stimuli. To one patient, Yealland applied electricity to his neck and throat for periods of 20 minutes, lighted cigarettes to the man’s tongue, and hot plates to the back of his mouth. Treatment lasted four hours until the patient “was cured.” (Broken Men, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-shock-of-war-55376701/#:~:text=The%20official%20Report%20of%20the,of%20concussion%20shock%2C%20following%20a)

Psychological Therapy

A few forward shell shock treatment units followed the psychological approach of abreaction or talk therapy to release pent-up emotions (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abreaction). Psychological treatment was more commonly used in base hospitals in the UK, such as Craiglockhart Military Hospital in Slateford, and its physicians, including W. H. R. Rivers (profiled in Pat Barker’s Regeneration series).

Abreaction often began with hypnosis to guide shell-shocked soldiers into the past so they could recover memories and emotions associated with a traumatic event, and it followed a step-by-step process of reliving the traumatic event so it would no longer be suppressed but recognized and integrated into the conscious mind. (Shell Shock and PTSD)

Little apparently was learned about psychological therapy from the experiences of the shell-shocked and the doctors who treated them in WW I. The War Office Committee of Enquiry into Causation and Prevention of ‘Shell Shock,’ 1920-22 concluded that:

“In Forward Areas – No soldier should be allowed to think that loss of nervous or mental control provides an honourable avenue to escape from the battlefield, and every endeavour should be made to prevent slight cases leaving the battalion or divisional area, where treatment should be confined to provision of rest and comfort for those who need it and to heartening them for return to the front line.” (Extracts from a report from the War Office Committee of Enquiry into Causation and Prevention of `Shell-Shock’, (Catalogue ref: WO 32/4748)

The condition was not even discussed in post-WW I military training manuals, and many original military and medical treatment records were lost. The Blitz of WW II destroyed nearly 60 percent of British military records from WW I, and a fire at the National Personnel Records Office in St. Louis, MO, destroyed 80 percent of U.S. Army service records from 1912 to 1960. (Broken Men, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-shock-of-war-5376701/#:~:text=The%20official%20Report%20of%20the,of%20concussion%20shock%2C%20following%20a)

Remembering Shell Shock in Fiction

Some of the best known novels chronicling WW I include descriptions of the actual treatment of shell shock. The first in Pat Barker’s trilogy Regeneration (1993) takes readers into the treatment theater at Craiglockhart War Hospital and recreates psychotherapeutic sessions with Siegfried Sassoon by W. H. R. Rivers, the first military physician to advocate for cathartic abreaction, talk therapy to bring subconscious fears to the forefront, faced, and resolved.

Toni Morrison’s Sula (1973) looks at the other side of therapy—forcing the shell-shocked to overcome their shame and cowardice and exhibit proper behaviors through physical shocks, punishment, and discipline.

A couple of recent works reveal the chaos faced by frontline medical staff. Sisters of the Great War by Suzanne Feldman (2021) describes the “unexploded bombs, artillery noise, strafing planes, fire and damage from exploding shells, constant tension, wild rumors, dearth of necessary supplies, constant poor nutrition, lack of fresh water, and possible impending death” in hospitals and aid stations. (https://historicalnovelsociety.org/reviews/sisters-of-the-great-war/

The Shadow of the Mole details the “chamber pot of France” in the Argonne as Dr. Michel Denis makes his way to sickbay, walking in the trenches to the semi-underground medical way station located within crates of medical supplies, food, and ammunition as shells explode overhead, shake the walls, and flicker the light from candles in their lanterns. (https://historicalnovelsociety.org/reviews/the-shadow-of-the-mole/)

A psychological murder mystery links treatment of American vets from Iraq and Afghanistan to planned killings of Allied soldiers in psychiatric hospitals during WW I. (Shell Shock, 2024)

Both Mrs. Dalloway by Virginia Woolf and Death of a Hero by Richard Aldington illustrate the devastating consequences of ignoring or improperly treating shell shock (“suggesting an out-of-doors game” because there is “nothing seriously the matter”) and the importance of communication so the shell shocked and others can listen and learn. 

Sources

Trevor Dodman: Shell Shock, Memory, and the Novel in the Wake of World War I, Cambridge University Press, 2015

Edgar Jones and Simon Wessely, Shell Shock to PTSD, Psychology Press, 2015

Austin Riede, Transatlantic Shell Shock, University of North Georgia, 2019

Fiona Reid, Broken Men, Continuum Books, 2010

David Stevenson, Cataclysm, Basic Books, 2004

Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

Shell Shock in World War I Literature

He stopped and looked across the field. The distance had vanished in a veil of rain. He didn’t know where he was going, or why, but he thought he ought to take shelter, and began to run clumsily along the brow of a hill towards a distance clump of trees. The mud dragged at him, he had to slow to a walk. Every step was a separate effort, hauling his mud-clogged boots out of the sucking earth. His mind was incapable of making comparisons, but his aching things remembered, and he listened for the whine of shells….

Something brushed against his cheek, and he raised his hand to push it away. His fingers touched slime, and he snatched them back. He turned and saw a dead mole, suspended, apparently, in the air, its black fur spiked with blood, its small pink hands folded on its chest.

Looking up, he saw that the tree he stood under was laden with dead animals. Bore them like fruit. A whole branch of moles in various stages of decay, a ferret, a weasel, three magpies, a fox, the fox hanging quite close, its lips curled back from bloodied teeth.

Chapter 4, Regeneration.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/regeneration-trilogy-pat-barker/dp/0141030933

 

I see a great blazing arc of flashes in the sky. At my right, a shadow scampers over the torn duckboards. A blackened face, huge eyes. He disappears. The ground has swallowed him….

I strain to clear my vision.

The shelling stops. My ears are ringing.

I hear a faint cry. A child’s whimpering?

I see it. A soldier has fallen into a shell-hole, filled with mud as thick as porridge, slimy and viscous like the starfish that fascinated me as a kid.

He is already submerged up to his shoulder.

Already? How much time has passed?

I break loose from my body, hover over the scene.

Is it really true that I crawl to the deep hole, murmuring some long forgotten song, and extend my hand?

A cry of agonizing fear.

Is it really true that everything on the front goes suddenly quiet?

I see myself extending my right arm, trying to pull the sinking soldier out of the mud.

Burbling at the corners of the mouth now.

I don’t have any power in my right arm.

I am too dazed.

The mud is as cold and clingy as the slush we used for snowballs, my childhood friend Leon and I.

I don’t have a grip on his body.

Am I pulling him by his hair now?

He’s gone.                                                               

The mud whispers: your fault, your fault…

Chapter Twenty-Seven, The Shadow of the Mole.

https://www.amazon.com/Shadow-Mole-Bob-Van-Laerhoven/dp/4824126436 (For this author’s book review, see: https://historicalnovelsociety.org/reviews/the-shadow-of-the-mole/)

Descriptions of shell shock appear as early as 490 BC when Herodotus tells of a soldier in the Battle of Marathon who was blind despite having no signs of physical injury. Shell shock was called Nostalgia in 1678 and Windage during the Civil War when otherwise healthy veterans of battle became weak and showed a “soldier’s” or an “irritable heart.”  (Anthony Babington: Shell-Shock, A History of the Changing Attitudes to War Neurosis).

Shell shock became a widespread phenomenon among soldiers in WW I because of the nature of the conflict: trench warfare that kept soldiers in confined spaces while bombardments rained down and the dead bodies of their comrades lay next to them and exposed them to new types of lethal weapons—machine guns, artillery, gas and chemical attacks.  (David Stevenson: Cataclysm; Austin Riede: Transatlantic Shell Shock)

Shell shock was first described as a medical condition by the physician Charles Myers in the British journal Lancet in 1915. Myers linked soldiers’ bouts of paralysis and the sudden inability to speak to “changes in atmosphere pressure under bombardment.” The condition was not considered to be a psychological response to combat experiences until the battle of the Somme, July-November, 1916, when casualties among British and French troops topped 600,000, (Cataclysm) and front-line physicians had little understanding of the condition, its symptoms and disabilities, nor clear ways to address it. (Transatlantic Shell Shock)

Novelists approached WWI shell shock in a variety of ways. Rebecca West and Virginia Woolf gave voice to women who observe the sequelae of shell shock in traumatized young men: the suicidal Septimus Smith in West’s Mrs. Dalloway (1925) and the amnesiac Chris Baldry in Woolf’s The Return of the Soldier (1918). Ralph Ellison and Toni Morrison illuminated the experiences of shell-shocked African Americans in Invisible Man (1952) and Sula (1973). Veterans recalled some of their own experiences in works of fiction: Richard Aldington in his story of the once outgoing painter George Winterbourne who withdraws from the world after the war in Death of a Hero (1929) and Siegfried Sassoon in the recollections of a fictionalized infantry officer in The Memoirs of George Sherston 1928-1936).

The two authors cited in this blog post introduce readers to men who are living with the effects of shell shock and the physicians who treat them.

Pat Barker, Regeneration

The first of the three novels in Pat Barker’s Regeneration series, was published in 1993. (The second, The Eye in the Door, followed soon after, and the third, The Ghost Road, appeared in 1995, winning that year’s Booker Prize.)

Regeneration tracks the paths of real life and fictional WW I veterans as they are being treated in Craigslockhart Hospital, Edinburgh, in 1917. The patients include writers Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfrid Owen, both known for their poems and other writings about shell shock, as well as the imaginary patients Prior and Burns. The novel centers on treatments and the physicians who administer them. In addition to the fictional Dr. Brock, Regeneration features W.H.R. Rivers, a neurologist, social anthropologist, and army captain, and Lewis Yealland and contrasts the two schools of thought about clinical interventions that would address shell shock and quickly return fighting men to the front.

https://litfl.com/william-halse-rivers/

Rivers led patients to explore their feelings, reconsider their notions of what it means to be a man, and recount their painful recollections of combat to restore emotional health. Barker relies on Rivers’ own descriptions of treatment methods: His report “The Repression of War Experience” was published in Lancet in 1918, and his book Conflict and Dream, which refers to Sassoon at “Patient B,” was published after his death in 1923. Yealland made use of external shock therapies, such as applying electrodes until a mute patient was able to speak again, and explained the techniques in his own book Hysterical Disorders of Warfare, published in 1918. (Regeneration Authors Note)

Bob van Laerhoven, The Shadow of the Mole

Finalist for the 2022 Best Thriller Book Award in the Historical Fiction category, The Shadow of the Mole also melds fiction with facts about the recognition and treatment of shell shock. Psychiatrist-in-training Michel Denis is working with a patient nicknamed the Mole, a man discovered by French sappers in a tunnel in the Argonne in 1916. The Mole has no recollection of his present or his past life and believes he himself has died and been replaced by the Other who presses him to write the Other’s complex history, a history that includes interactions with the physician and physiologist acknowledged by Sigmund Freud and others as the progenitor of psychoanalysis—Dr. Josef Breuer.

Breuer reported on the results of his treatment of a patient he had diagnosed with hysteria in 1880. The patient, identified as Anna O., was social worker and writer Bertha Pappenheim. Breuer was able to relieve Anna O.’s symptoms of neurosis by using hypnosis to guide her as she remembered the unpleasant experiences she had suppressed. Freud characterized Breuer’s case study as the impetus for his method of exploring the unconscious minds of patients and bringing to light the unconscious causes of their symptoms.  (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Josef-Breuer)

http://www.ecured.cu/index.php/Josef_Breuer

 

Both Regeneration and The Shadow of the Mole highlight the lack of understanding of the widespread presence of shell shock in military veterans that existed not only during WW I but continued through WW II and other major conflicts. The phenomenon was not fully recognized until the 1980s when medical professionals and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs labeled the condition post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

The next post in the Time Stamp blog will provide a brief history of the ways the recognition and treatment of shell shock evolved over the decades.

Sources

Austin Reade, Transatlantic Shell Shock, University of Georgia Press, 2019

David Stevenson, Cataclysm, The First World War as Political Tragedy, Basic Books, 2004

Pat Barker, Regeneration, Plume, 1991

Siegfried Sassoon, Memoirs of an Infantry Officer, Penguin Books, 1930

Rebecca West, The Return of the Soldier, Penguin Classics, 1918

Virginia Woolf, Mrs. Dalloway, Everyman’s Library, 1928

(https://www.britannica.com/biography/Josef-Breuer

  

Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

World War I in Literature

Jean Dumoulin, one of the diggers sent into a series of tunnels in the Argonne known as Satan’s Lair in February, 1916, is clearing rubble along the entry to an old mine shaft when he finds what he considers to be “another stiff.” Minutes later in the Meurisson Alley Field Hospital, Dr. Michel Denis examines the body, and the man opens his eyes.

With no memory of who he is or what has happened to him, the man becomes known as the Mole, and Denis and others try to piece together his story. Captain Réviron thinks the man is a deserter and should be court martialed. Denis believes he has lost his memory and maybe even his mind because of shell shock. The Mole himself insists he is irrevocably dead and an Other is pulling his strings when he writes in a gray journal details about a French diplomat, spies in the Prussian empire, and scientists who are just beginning to understand the workings of the human mind.

https://www.amazon.com/Shadow-Mole-Bob-Van-Laerhoven/dp/4824126436

For this author’s book review, see: https://historicalnovelsociety.org/reviews/the-shadow-of-the-mole/

The Shadow of the Mole is an award-winning novel by Belgian/Flemish author Bob Van Laerhoven, who writes regularly about conflict or political and societal unrest. With The Shadow of the Mole and the subsequent Firehand Files, Van Laerhoven explores what has come to be known as the Forgotten War—World War I.

 The Forgotten War

It was called the Great War, the Good War, the War to End All Wars.

World War I was the first conflict to span the European continent and involve North America and the Far East—pitting the Central Powers of Germany (Austria Hungary, Bulgaria, and Turkey) against the Allied Powers (Britain, France, Italy, Romania, Russia, Japan, and the United States).

It also was the first to use advanced mechanized weapons—tanks, airplanes, machine guns.

From its beginning in June, 1914, to its end on November 11, 1918, World War I cost 16 million lives--9 million military men and 7 million civilians--permanently disabled 7 million fighting men, and caused 37 million casualties https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-i/world-war-i-history

 The war precipitated the collapse of four monarchies—Austria Hungary, Germany, Russia, and Turkey—sparked the rise of Bolshevism in Russia and fascism in Italy and Germany, and forever changed industrial production and women’s place in the workforce.

 Yet it is largely forgotten. Many can’t name a single battle, recognize the names of heroes of the time—flying ace Eddie Rickenbacker (highlighted in the 1945 film Captain Eddie) starring Fred McMurray https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0037575/) and infantryman Alvin York (memorialized in Sgt. York, the film starring Gary Cooper https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0034167/).

Recent films have shown a spotlight on the conflict. Sam Mendes’ tribute to his grandfather’s WW I war stories—1917—followed the path of two British lance corporals as they race to deliver a message that will call off a planned attack by the Devonshire regiment and protect 1600 British infantry lives. The film grossed $384 million and was voted one of the best films of 2020. The 2022 All Quiet on the Western Front reimagined the 1929 novel by Erich Maria Remarche that trailed a 17-year-old German soldier across battlefields and in trenches while armistice talks ensued. The film was voted won of the top five foreign films by the National Board of Review and won the San Diego Film Critics’ Society Best International Film award.

 The number of portrayals of WW I nevertheless pales in comparison with those of WW II.  While about 130 films have been made about WW I, more than ten times that number have been made about WW II, including 250 before war’s end. In 2023 45 novels about WW I were listed on Goodreads compared to 100 about WW II on Amazon. Twenty-eight TV series have focused on the First World War. The same number of series on the Second World War were produced in one decade—2010.

 The lack of interest is perhaps understandable. The precipitating action and reasons for going to war in 1914 were murky, especially for the US: an assassination of the heir to the Austria Hungary Empire by a Serbian nationalist. The morality and presence of villains Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini as well as the direct attack in Pearl Harbor made entry into war by the US a clear cut necessity little more than 30 years later.

The nature of the battles themselves is also a factor. WW I was a step-by-step grind over mud-soaked territory from deeply dug trenches up and overland and toward barbed-wire frontlines.

WW 2 spanned the air and the seas, the dessert of North Africa and blacked out streets of London, the bitterly cold steppe near Stalingrad and the jungle heat of Iwo Jima.  

World War I and Literature

 What’s known as the modernist revolution in literature predates WWI. In 1908 poets and authors began experimenting with radical and utopian themes, newer forms of expression that focused on inner thoughts rather than outward actions, paid more attention to mood than sentiment, and opted for free verse instead of standard rhyming patterns.

 WW I introduced particularly dark themes and methods of expression. Chaos replaced idealism as writers broke from the past to respond to a changing world and explore the characteristics and failings of modern society. Works during the war years were often anxious, angry, and cynical, bleak and pessimistic.

 Perhaps most telling was the shift inward. Points of view were introspective, characters spoke through streams of consciousness or interior monologues, thoughts were expressed as they passed through the mind, beliefs about absolute truth were replaced by disillusionment and distrust of the channels of power—both government and religion.

 

Modernist Authors

 

Among the authors most often cited as WW I modernists are:

 Richard Aldington. His Death of a Hero (1929) reveals a soldier’s post-war struggles with daily life. “The casualty lists went on appearing for a long time after the Armistice - last spasms of Europe's severed arteries.” https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/94230.Richard_Aldington

T. S. Eliot. Wasteland (1922) stuns in its description of the devastation of war—

                                April is the cruelest month, breeding

                                Lilacs out of dead land, mixing

                                Memory and desire, stirring

                                Dull roots with spring rain

 Ernest Hemingway. A Farewell to Arms (1929) recalls his own experience fighting for the Italian army. “I had gone to no place where the roads were frozen and hard as iron, where it was clear cold and dry and the snow was dry and powdery and hare-tracks in the snow and the peasants took off their hats and called you Lord and there was good hunting. I had gone to no such place but to the smoke of cafes and nights when the room whirled and you needed to look at the wall to make it stop, nights in bed, drunk, when you knew that that was all there was.” https://www.litcharts.com/lit/a-farewell-to-arms/themes/war

 Wilfred Owen. Anthem for Doomed Youth (1917) portrays the horrors of war where men “die as cattle” amid the “monstrous anger of guns” and corpses lie “face downward in the sucking mud, wallowed like trodden sand-bags loosely filled.”

 Siegfried Sassoon. Memories of an Infantry Officer (1930) humbles the distant observers of war--

                                You smug-faced crowds with kindling eyes

                                Who cheer when soldier lads march by

                                Sneak home and pray you’ll never know

                                The hell where youth and laughter go

 Rebecca West. The Return of the Soldier (1918) emphasizes the persistence of traumatic memory. “He walked not loose-limbed like a boy, as he had done that very afternoon, but with the soldier’s hard tread upon the heel. It recalled to me that, bad as we were, we were yet not the worst circumstance of his return. When we had lifted the yoke of our embraces from his shoulders he would go back to that flooded trench in Flanders under that sky more full of flying death than clouds, to that No Man’s Land where bullets fall like rain on the rotting faces of the dead.” https://www.litcharts.com/lit/the-return-of-the-soldier/quotes

Authors of Today

Some of the most recent novels set during WW I shed light on previously untold aspects of the conflict. The Porcelain Moon tells of the 140,000 Chinese people who were brought to Europe to serve as laborers in farms and factories.

Canary Girls recalls the Thornshire Canaries Ladies’ Football Club and the Football Battalion of the war years.

In Memoriam tells of young boarding school men’s involvement in the war and the love they shared with one another.

Almost a paean to the works of the early 1900s is The Shadow of the Mole. Named the best literary historical novel of 2022 by the Historical Fiction Company, the novel conveys the brutality and traumatic effects of war on mind and body. As author Van Laerhoven observes: “Delusions, shell shock, neurasthenia, constitutional fragility…are those names and theories, just to hide the naked fact that war was an all-consuming and putrefying disease in itself devouring its young, a gangrene of the mind.”

 

World War I literature and shell shock—next time on Time Stamp.

 

Sources:

https://books.google.com/books/about/Bad_Moon_Rising.html?id=tJw6EAAAQBAJ&source=kp_author_description 

 https://www.history.com/news/how-world-war-i-changed-literature 

 https://www.studysmarter.co.uk/explanations/english-literature/literary-devices/first-world-war-fiction/#:~:text=Impact%20of%20the%20First%20World%20War%20on%20English%20fiction,-In%20English%20fiction&text=Many%20authors%20and%20poets%20who,the%20internal%20struggles%20during%20warfare. 

 https://www.history.com/news/how-world-war-i-changed-literature

Out of the wasteland: the First World War and modernism. The evolution of modernist literature was intimately bound up with the shock and devastation of the war

https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/heritage/out-of-the-wasteland-the-first-world-war-and-modernism-1.2190829

HomeLiteratureLiteratures of the World

https://humanities.byu.edu/writing-the-war-to-end-the-war-literary-modernism-and-wwi/

How World War I Changed Literature, by AMANDA ONION, UPDATED: MARCH 27, 2023 | ORIGINAL: APRIL 26, 2018     

Time Stamp: History Book Releases, Reviews, and Reports

Forensics in a Nutshell

Theresa Ryan is worried about her sister Maggie. She’s seen neither hide nor hair of Maggie for weeks. So she’s come to the boarding house where her sister is living on Copp’s Hill, Boston. Hearing no response to her call from the front door of the building, Theresa rushes up the stairway, only to come to a dead stop. The door to Maggie’s room is open, two empty chairs sit at the foot of the mussed but empty bed, dirty glasses lie on the floor. Attracted by the sound of running water, Theresa enters the bathroom, stumbling over an empty bottle, and shivers when she sees Maggie in the bathtub, fully dressed while water from the faucet falls onto her open blue eyes. Theresa shudders as the floor rattles and cracks open, the building shakes, and the room falls apart under the weight of a wave of thick, sticky liquid that smells like baked beans.

Dr. George Burgess “Jake” Magrath, medical examiner for Suffolk County, Massachusetts, hurries to Commercial Street at the base of Copp’s Hill. A massive industrial accident has released tons of molasses onto city streets, crashing buildings to the ground, burying men, women, and children, and leading to “unexplained deaths” he has the responsibility to explain. With him is a woman determined to provide help—his long-time friend Mrs. Frances Glessner Lee.

Together, Jake and Fanny pull together the details of the accident—The Great Molasses Flood of 1919—the crime scene around Maggie’s death and the identity of the killer in Molasses Murder in a Nutshell. Molasses is the first in a new mystery series by Frances McNamara, known for her Emily Cabot books. The book recalls the actual Molasses Flood and introduces readers to the important forensic work conducted by Glessner Lee and Magrath. The book and the mystery series build on a quote from Lee about forensics: “The investigator must bear in mind that he has a two-fold responsibility—to clear the innocent as well as to expose the guilty. He is seeking only facts—the Truth in a Nutshell.”

1919: the Boston Molasses Flood and the Year of Violence and Disillusion - U.S. Studies Online | U.S. Studies Online (usso.uk)

 At about half-past noon on January 15, 1919, sounds of disaster reverberated down Commercial Street opposite Copp’s Hill in Boston’s North End—a sharp, metallic roar followed by rumbling, hissing, and finally the boom of an explosion that sent a 15-foot-high wall of molasses speeding at 35 miles an hour into commercial buildings, houses, the local firehouse. The thick sticky liquid snapped electric poles and the solid steel supports beneath the elevated train platform, knocked some buildings off their foundations, trapped, swallowed, and drowned pedestrians, residents, and horses. Though the wave of liquid quickly receded, it took days for rescue workers to find the missing and weeks to clean out the muck. In the end, the incident killed 21 people and injured 150.

The molasses, destined eventually for the manufacture of munitions, had been stored in a massive 50-foot-high, 90-foot-wide steel tank built and operated by Purity Distilling Company, a subsidiary of U. S. Industrial Alcohol. The accident, initially blamed on anarchists by USIA, was the result of negligence. Experts in court cases proved the tank’s steel walls were too thin, rivets were faulty and cracked under pressure, and warnings were ignored. One of those experts was Dr. George Burgess Magrath, medical examiner of Suffolk County, Massachusetts. He had been among the first responders on the scene and set up a field hospital and temporary morgue. He later testified about the causes of death: bodies crushed by debris, suffocation or drowning from molasses in their lungs.

Forensics Failures

At the time of the Molasses Flood, the individual responsible for investigating suspicious deaths in most jurisdictions was a coroner. But an extensive study of New York City coroners from the inception of the coroner system in 1898 to 1915 found that not a single one was qualified or trained to perform his duties. Only 19 of 65 coroners had been physicians, 18 were undertakers, seven were politicians, six were real estate dealers, two were plumbers, and two were saloon keepers. Among the rest were an auctioneer, butcher, musician, milkman, and wood carver. (Bruce Goldfarb, 18 Tiny Deaths, Sourcebooks, Naperville, IL, 2020)

Most conducted a superficial examination, if they did any at all. Many certified causes of death were patently absurd: The cause of death of one man was certified by a coroner as a thoracic aneurysm despite the fact that he had been holding a revolver and had a bullet wound in his mouth. (18 Tiny Deaths)

Police were not only untrained for forensic investigations, they often destroyed evidence at the scene—walking through blood, moving the body, handling the supposed weapon. Detectives were not much better: Nearly 25 percent of the detectives in Cleveland were considered to have the mentality of boys no older than 13. (18 Tiny Deaths)

Boston was the first city to establish a formal medical examiner’s office in 1877. The first person to hold the job of medical examiner was a physician, Dr. Francis A. Harris. The second was Dr. George Burgess Magrath, a specialist in pathology and instructor in legal medicine at Harvard Medical School who incorporated the latest and most advanced systems of death investigation after spending a year in London and Paris. (18 Tiny Deaths)

Gathering, interpreting, and presenting evidence from crime scenes were still highly problematic. A landmark 1928 study, The Coroner and the Medical Examiner, faulted legal medical education, noting “In not a single school is there a course in which the student [of legal medicine] may be systematically instructed in the duties…which may arise as the result of crime or accident.” (18 Tiny Deaths)

Glessner Lee and Magrath changed all that. Glessner Lee endowed the Department of Legal Medicine at Harvard and supported the professor of legal medicine, Dr. George Magrath, beginning in 1932. In 1937, Dr. Alan Richard Moritz was named chair of the department.

The Nutshell Studies

In 1944, Glessner Lee decided to develop an intensive one-week seminar in the medical aspects of crime detection for the individuals most often called to crime scenes first—state troopers. The problem? Providing first-hand experience of crime scenes or tools that mimicked what they would see in the field.

Glessner Lee’s solution? 18- by 18-inch, doll-house-like wooden boxes or dioramas that presented crime-scene details in three dimensions. The first was based on an actual case—a man repeatedly had threatened to commit suicide by placing a noose over his neck, mounting a crate or box, and waiting for his wife to convince him to step down. Then, one day, the crate broke, and he hanged himself.

Glessner Lee created 18 dioramas, known as the Nutshell Case Studies. One called Kitchen. The corpse of a woman in front of a gas stove, gas jets open, doors locked, newspapers stuffed around the door frames. But: half-peeled potatoes indicated the woman was preparing dinner, a can of soda on the table and ice trays on the floor suggested the woman was preparing a drink for a visitor. Suicide? Maybe not.

Nutshell Studies: This amazing woman changed forensics with her miniature crime scenes (mookychick.co.uk)

 Directly related to McNamara’s Molasses Murder is the Dark Bathroom diorama, inspired by a series of bathroom murders in England. A woman’s fully dressed body lies face-up in a bathtub, water streaming onto her face.

Nutshell Studies: the extraordinary miniature crime scenes US police use to train detectives (telegraph.co.uk)

(Photos of the Nutshell Studies and details about their construction may be found in: The Nutshell Studies of Unexplained Death, by Corrine May Botz, The Monacellli Press, New York, 2004.}

In the seminars, police attended lectures about causes of death and the difference between blunt and penetrating injuries and an autopsy and interacted with the dioramas. Each police officer had 90 minutes to observe two of the dioramas and develop reports on them. As Glessner Lee explained, the diorama were not meant to serve as cases that needed to be solved. Rather, they were “exercises in observing, interpreting, evaluating and reporting,” illustrating the most basic requirement of crime scene investigation—resisting the temptation to jump to conclusions. (18 Tiny Deaths)

Outside of the seminar classroom, the dioramas have been featured in national magazines, beginning with an article in Life magazine in 1946 and The Case of the Dubious Bridegroom by Perry Mason author Erle Stanley Gardner. The Nutshell Studies themselves are still used to train police officers.

 

Sources

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Great-Molasses-Flood 

https://www.history.com/news/the-great-molasses-flood-of-1919 

https://www.boston-discovery-guide.com/great-molasses-flood.html 

https://time.com/5500592/boston-great-molasses-flood-100/ 

https://www.npr.org/2019/01/15/685154620/a-deadly-tsunami-of-molasses-in-bostons-north-end 

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Great-Molasses-Flood 

htts://www.history.com/news/great-molasses-flood-science 

 Goldfarb, Bruce: 18 Tiny Deaths, Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks, 2020.

Botz, Corinne May: The Nutshell Studies of Unexplained Death, New York: The Monacelli Press, 2004.